Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free
Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business and the world
Key Takeaways
- **Emerging Market Due Diligence Imperative:** The proposed Albanian resort illustrates the critical need for robust political and governance risk assessment in frontier markets, where perceived “opportunities” can be quickly overshadowed by social unrest, regulatory opacity, and accusations of crony capitalism, deterring legitimate institutional investment.
- **Reputational Risk Premium for PEP-linked Ventures:** Investments tied to Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), especially those with a history of blurring public and private interests, carry a significant reputational risk premium. This heightened scrutiny can lead to project delays, legal challenges, and a loss of social license, ultimately impacting long-term viability and investor confidence.
- **Erosion of Market Integrity & Governance Standards:** The overt blurring of political influence and private commercial interests, as exemplified by these ventures, signals a dangerous normalization of practices that undermine market integrity, distort fair competition, and could lead to a broader degradation of global governance standards, impacting the flow of capital and the predictability of legal frameworks.
As global investors with an eye for an opportunity, it is easy to see why Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump have alighted on the idea of a resort on Albania’s coast. From a purely market-driven perspective, the pitch practically writes itself: Albania offers a compelling frontier market proposition. It’s not just a stunning spot; in the language of American realtors and private equity funds, it is ripe with opportunity on the last undeveloped stretch of the Dalmatian coast, promising high potential returns in an emerging tourism market.
You can imagine the pitch doing the rounds in New York boardrooms. To the south are Greece’s taverna-strewn Ionian Islands, boasting mature tourism infrastructure and established visitor flows. To the north, Montenegro’s coastline is rapidly being concreted over with hotels, indicating high demand and proving the market’s viability. Beyond that, Croatia has a 300-mile treasure trail of luxury and mass-market tourism. Here is your chance to fill in the last piece of the Dalmatian jigsaw, offering a first-mover advantage in a market with lower land acquisition and labor costs compared to its saturated neighbors. And it’s good for Albania, promising vital foreign direct investment (FDI) and job creation!
Indeed, it absolutely makes sense for what is one of Europe’s smallest and poorest countries to try to cash in at last on its pristine beaches. When I first visited the country in the 1990s, soon after the downfall of communism, I stayed in the drabbest of state hotels and remember imagining happily, but without much confidence, that one day its coast could fund its recovery through robust tourism revenue. However, for sophisticated institutional investors, the allure of high returns in emerging markets is always tempered by the need for meticulous due diligence, particularly regarding political and governance risks. And it is precisely on these critical risk factors that the Trump-Kushner plan trips up. If Donald Trump’s political advisers have any say in his entourage’s affairs — or for that matter any good sense — they would be advising his daughter and son-in-law to walk away now, not just for political optics, but for sound investment strategy.
As the list of the Trump circle’s business entanglements grows and grows, it seems ever more likely it contains the seeds of the Trump project’s decline. For markets, this presents a significant governance red flag. As former UK prime minister Boris Johnson found to his cost, it is sometimes a seemingly small scandal that can prove a tipping point, eroding public trust and, crucially, investor confidence in regulatory predictability and the rule of law.
In Albania, the Trump-Kushner plan has ignited the “Flamingo Revolution”. Nightly protests, backed by the pop star Dua Lipa, were sparked by concerns the project would harm a nature reserve known for the exotic birds. This is a potent ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) risk that modern institutional investors cannot ignore. Beyond the immediate environmental concerns, the protests are now targeting more broadly the prevailing culture of crony capitalism, and a scandal over seemingly corrupt land sales linked to the proposed site. For any project seeking international financing or long-term viability, such social unrest and allegations of impropriety represent significant downside risk, potentially leading to costly delays, litigation, and reputational damage that could make the project uninsurable or unfinanceable by mainstream lenders.
On one level this Balkan drama may appear remote compared to conflicts of interest over say World Liberty Financial, the Trump-backed crypto venture. But this is about more — or rather even more — than the dear flamingos and ambient sleaze. This is about a sense that if you are close to Trump, the normal rules of market conduct, ethical investing, and regulatory compliance do not apply. In its simplicity and egregiousness, this points to what could be the Democrats’ strongest attack line. There is surely fertile terrain here for hearings if they win back the House of Representatives in November, which would inevitably shine a spotlight on these deals, increasing their political risk premium and deterring potential partners.
There is no evidence of wrongdoing by Kushner’s consortium. However, the signal their plan sends is dire for market integrity. As the US president’s lead mediator in global crises, Kushner is arguably subordinate only to vice-president JD Vance and secretary of state Marco Rubio in US foreign policy. Yet there he is pursuing a mega-investment overseas, and in a country which is notoriously corrupt (ranking 98th out of 180 countries on Transparency International’s 2023 Corruption Perception Index). Such actions directly undermine US efforts to promote good governance and anti-corruption measures globally, making it harder for legitimate American businesses to compete fairly.
What has happened to the old principle of government that required you to park business interests — and fill out disclosure forms? When I put that question to a former US foreign service official, they replied that conflicts of interest had become “a feature not a bug” of the system, adding: “I tell old colleagues to keep notes of every meeting and not to get involved.” For market participants, this “feature” translates into increased uncertainty, higher transaction costs, and a distorted playing field where political connections may outweigh merit or efficiency.
Trump probably admires Julius Caesar; after all, the dictator had no time for constitutional niceties. But the US president clearly lacks Caesar’s instincts on propriety. When Caesar divorced his wife after allegations of an affair, he supposedly said his family should be not just “free from guilt but free from the suspicion of it”. That is the issue here for investors: the suspicion of impropriety, especially in jurisdictions with weaker rule of law, is enough to deter risk-averse capital.
As Viktor Orbán, the former prime minister of Hungary, learnt when he was defeated in elections in April, if there is one thing that finally alienates voters it is a sense that elites are profiting from power. He could probably have gone on pursuing his nationalist projects indefinitely if his circle had not so patently succumbed to greed, creating an uneven economic landscape that stifled broad-based growth and alienated ordinary citizens and legitimate businesses.
At this point Trump-weary readers will say it is late in the day, if not naive, to sound shocked by such behaviour. The more cynical will rightly add this has always happened behind the scenes. But that is the point: behind the scenes. The US and indeed my own country, Britain, and most others, have always had conflicts of interest. Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, was caught up in such a scandal in Ukraine. But in recent decades at least these have been confined to the shadows. The difference now is that the profiteering is in plain sight. People close to Trump seem willing to flaunt their commercial ambitions, creating a unique risk profile for any venture they touch.
Take Pakistan, a country that, like Albania, has a weak record in tackling corruption, is dominated by rich families, and has links to Trump’s team. Pakistan’s de facto ruler, Field Marshal Asim Munir, has met Zach Witkoff — the son of Trump’s other lead mediator, the businessman Steve Witkoff — at least twice. And lo! Pakistani officials have done fledgling deals with World Liberty Financial, of which the younger Witkoff is CEO and a co-founder. This intertwining of high-level political access with a nascent, often unregulated, cryptocurrency venture in a geopolitically sensitive and corruption-prone country raises serious questions about due diligence, money laundering risks, and the potential for regulatory arbitrage. It creates a market environment susceptible to manipulation and lacking the transparency essential for sustainable investment.
As for Albania, this investment will probably suffer the fate of another Kushner-backed Balkans project: his plan to build a luxury hotel in Serbia’s capital Belgrade was eventually axed last year after a political storm. This serves as a tangible market precedent, demonstrating how political backlash and public scrutiny can quickly derail projects, leading to sunk costs and write-offs, regardless of initial market opportunity assessments.
But what of America? Will this brazen culture become an accepted standard, normalising the use of public office for private gain? Or will the country respond by erecting stronger safeguards? If the Democrats were smart, this and not anti-capitalism would be their focus in November, as it speaks directly to the integrity of markets and the fairness of economic opportunity, issues that resonate deeply with voters and investors alike.
[email protected]
Market Impact
The explicit convergence of political influence and private commercial interests, as highlighted by these ventures, carries significant implications across global markets. For emerging economies like Albania, it risks deterring legitimate, long-term foreign direct investment from institutional players who prioritize stability, transparency, and robust rule of law. Instead, it could attract speculative capital or entities willing to operate within opaque frameworks, fostering a cycle of crony capitalism that distorts fair competition, inhibits broad-based economic development, and makes a country’s financial assets appear riskier to external investors. For the United States, this normalization of political-commercial entanglement undermines its global credibility in promoting good governance and anti-corruption initiatives, potentially weakening its diplomatic leverage and the standing of its own financial markets as bastions of integrity. Ultimately, such practices introduce an unpredictable political risk premium into global transactions, creating an uneven playing field that rewards connections over merit, and eroding the fundamental trust essential for efficient and equitable capital allocation worldwide.