Unlock the Editor’s Digest free of charge
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
The US is eyeing a multibillion-dollar slice of Britain’s pork, poultry, rice and seafood sectors, because it seems to be to increase its commerce settlement with the UK, Donald Trump’s agriculture secretary stated on Tuesday.
Brooke Rollins stated these sectors had been “on the entrance of the road” in ongoing negotiations to construct on the commerce deal introduced final week, which gave US beef and bioethanol producers expanded entry to the UK market.
The US has touted the deal as a $5bn alternative for American farmers, ranchers and producers. However the preliminary textual content of the settlement solely covers about $950mn of commerce in hormone-free US beef and ethanol.
“Definitely pork and poultry are on the entrance of the road, together with rice and seafood,” Rollins stated at a press convention in London on Tuesday, when requested about additional merchandise beneath dialogue.
She added: “Meals safety is nationwide safety. The UK, for instance, actually depends on China and Russia to your seafood. America has extraordinary best-in-class seafood. Let’s discuss that.”
The remarks are more likely to stir concern amongst British farmers and meals producers, who’ve already raised alarms about probably being undercut by cheaper US imports that won’t meet UK or EU manufacturing requirements.
The UK has excessive tariffs on many agricultural merchandise together with as much as 72 pence per kilogramme on pork, 107p on poultry, and 18 per cent on shrimp.
“We’re more than pleased to compete on a like-for-like foundation,” stated Richard Griffiths, chief govt of the British Poultry Council. “But when we permit imports which can be produced to requirements beneath ours, that’s unfair competitors.”
Rollins advised that some US exporters would regulate to fulfill British expectations, in a softening from final week when she stated that no business had been “handled extra unfairly than our agriculture business”.
Whereas she defended the security of hormone-treated beef and chlorinated rooster on Tuesday, she stated beef producers could also be ready to ditch hormones with a view to promote to the UK and confused that “solely about 5 per cent” of US rooster is now washed with chlorine.
American producers “are consistently watching what the markets seem like, and if the markets are calling for a particular kind, or they’ve extra alternative someplace, then I believe that we, probably, do see some motion available in the market,” she stated.
Griffiths countered that amongst US producers “it’s customary follow to wash up on the finish” with chemical washes — together with however not restricted to chlorine.
Compared, he stated, British poultry farmers have to advertise hygiene all through the entire course of, and might solely use water. That is a lot costlier, he added.
UK ministers have repeatedly insisted that chlorinated rooster and hormone-treated beef would stay unlawful in Britain.
Rollins additionally confused the reciprocal advantages for UK exporters: “Whereas, the truth is, we’re enthusiastic about getting American beef, ethanol [and] hopefully down the road, rice, seafood, different merchandise are coming into your nation, that is additionally about getting extra of your nation’s merchandise into ours as nicely.”
The Division for Enterprise and Commerce didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
This text has been amended to make clear that the feedback had been made by the US agriculture secretary
