Unlock the Editor’s Digest without spending a dime
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
The way forward for Thames Water is hanging within the stability after KKR, the US personal fairness agency, walked away from a £4bn rescue deal for the troubled utility that serves 16mn folks in and round London.
The subsequent steps for the corporate, which is struggling underneath a near-£20bn debt mountain, might be essential because it tries to stave off short-term nationalisation.
Why did KKR stroll away?
KKR spent two months evaluating a deal to rescue Thames Water, with over 100 folks each inside and outdoors the agency engaged on an intensive due diligence course of that included a number of website visits in and round London.
However ultimately, it withdrew from the method nearly instantly after submitting formal plans that detailed how it will steer a turnaround of Thames Water.
KKR executives in New York grew involved concerning the regulatory and political uncertainty across the UK water sector, in response to folks near the discussions, given the billions of kilos it will have to decide to a deal.
Fears mounted across the scope for continued political interference within the working of Britain’s largest water utility, the folks added.
Even a government-arranged name over the weekend between Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s enterprise adviser Varun Chandra and KKR’s co-founder Henry Kravis was not sufficient to allay these issues.
Thames Water was left to announce KKR’s withdrawal on Tuesday, the identical day {that a} government-led evaluate advisable an overhaul of the system of regulation for the water sector.
Will Thames Water’s lenders now step in?
Thames Water now has to depend on its backup plan: a recapitalisation proposal from its senior lenders from whom it secured a separate £3bn emergency mortgage in March.
Holders of the corporate’s top-ranking “class A” debt additionally submitted an in depth turnaround plan to Thames Water and sector regulator Ofwat final week, which included a proposed administration workforce to run the struggling utility.
Thames Water’s class A lenders account for over £17bn of its close to £20bn debt stack and embrace US hedge funds akin to Elliott Administration, in addition to UK asset managers akin to Aberdeen. The utility’s lower-ranking class B debt and additional loans at its holding corporations are anticipated to be worn out in a restructuring.
The senior bondholders have indicated that they’ve commitments in place to offer billions of kilos in new fairness funding, in response to an individual near the group. They’d additional strengthen the utility’s stability sheet by writing off a portion of their debt.
Whereas haircuts may very well be within the vary of 25 pence within the pound, the precise writedown is dependent upon the extent of concessions on points akin to fines and different penalties that bondholders are capable of negotiate with Ofwat.
The emergency mortgage of as a lot as £3bn ought to give it sufficient liquidity to final into subsequent yr, though the utility has to fulfill sure situations to proceed drawing on the funding.
Will different bidders come again to the desk?
Along with the proposals from KKR and collectors, Thames Water in March obtained 5 different preliminary fairness bids from a spread of infrastructure traders.
The utility’s resolution to award exclusivity to KKR rankled rival bidders akin to Hong Kong’s CK Infrastructure, which is a part of Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing’s wider CK Hutchison group. Ofwat was additionally pissed off at Thames Water’s resolution to freeze different bidders out of the method, the FT has beforehand reported.
At the very least a kind of beforehand jilted bidders is now in search of a method again into the method, with Fort Water — a provider of water to companies — stating on Tuesday that it was “prepared, prepared and capable of help the enterprise with the requisite financing in place and may transfer rapidly to offer Thames with the operational and monetary help it requires”.
Some have questioned whether or not it’s now possible for Thames Water and its advisers to reopen the equity-raise course of, nevertheless. One particular person near the discussions stated it will be “very tough” to duplicate the in depth due diligence KKR and the collectors had carried out in a fast sufficient timeframe.
May Thames Water be nationalised?
With Thames Water’s presumed saviour strolling away, hypothesis has grown over whether or not it might develop into the primary water firm to fall into the federal government’s particular administration regime since utilities in England and Wales have been privatised in 1989.
Beneath this course of, officers would appoint an administrator to take cost of the utility, with the UK authorities offering a mortgage to fund its operations and be sure that companies would hold working. The federal government might recoup this cash if Thames Water was then offered again to the personal sector.
Thames Water has already narrowly averted slipping right into a SAR this yr. Absent the emergency mortgage from collectors, the utility forecast its money stability might drop to as little as £39mn, the FT has beforehand reported.
Whereas the ruling Labour social gathering has insisted {that a} short-term renationalisation shouldn’t be within the pursuits of taxpayers, it’s coming underneath strain from rivals from each side of the political spectrum.
Charlie Maynard, a Liberal Democrat MP who spearheaded a public-interest court docket problem to Thames Water taking over extra high-interest debt, stated the corporate had reached “the top of the street” and that it was time for the federal government to step in.
“The collectors who’ve heaped billions in debt on to the corporate ought to now pay to kind this mess out,” he stated.
Richard Tice, deputy chief of Reform UK, stated the enterprise ought to be plunged into SAR “for a pound”, wiping out the shareholders and bondholders.
Tice informed the Commons: “Caveat emptor.”