Keep abreast of complimentary notifications
Simply enrol in the Sustainable power myFT Digest — delivered straight to your inbox.
The head of the United Kingdom’s publicly-owned green power firm has voiced support for increasing North Sea petroleum and natural gas output, intensifying scrutiny on energy minister Ed Miliband concerning his directive to prohibit fresh drilling permits.
Juergen Maier, who chairs Great British Energy, stated that even though greater domestic extraction would not reduce power expenses, it would foster employment and tax revenues. He further noted it could also result in fewer carbon emissions compared to imported fossil fuels.
His comments onLinkedInsurface as Miliband encounters demands to alter his approach in response to the Middle Eastern energy crisis.
The Conservative party is leveraging an opposition day debate on Tuesday to attempt to force a ballot on rescinding Labour’s prohibition on new extraction permits in the North Sea and endorsing two significant oil and gas reservoirs — Rosebank and Jackdaw.
Greg Jackson, chief executive of the UK’s largest household energy provider, Octopus Energy, has also advocated for heightened North Sea production, asserting that liquefied natural gas transported from across the globe was considerably “more polluting” than domestically sourced gas.
Tara Singh, the recently appointed chief executive of the renewable energy sector’s advocacy group, RenewableUK, penned an editorial for the Daily Telegraph last week, arguing that Britain ought to generate more power “of every variety” and that it was time “to depoliticise energy issues.”
The Labour government indicated last year its intent to permit developers to bore “connections” to existing fields, but has yet to implement the necessary legislation.
Miliband delivered a discourse on Monday evening to the Parliamentary Labour Party at its weekly assembly, where he defended the administration’s current stance.
“Anyone who suggests that new permits in the North Sea will impact pricing is misrepresenting the truth,” the energy minister declared, highlighting that both oil and gas are traded on global exchanges.
However, Miliband faced a challenge from a backbench Member of Parliament, Henry Tufnell, who has posited that enabling further North Sea drilling would be a “benefit for fiscal income” and invigorate Britain’s manufacturing industry.
In a LinkedIn post last week, GB Energy’s Maier articulated what he considered to be the justifications for augmented North Sea production, including mitigating job losses and bolstering tax revenues.
“I champion this as an encompassing and managed energy transition, with the ultimate goal being predominantly renewable energy generation,” he affirmed.
He elaborated: “I am entirely supportive [of increased domestic output], provided the final objective is clear — clean electricity, leading to widespread electrification . . . Nevertheless, I dispute the assertion that more oil and gas from the [N]orth [S]ea reduces energy costs. It does not; in fact, energy expenses are currently escalating precisely due to fossil fuels.”
Michael Shanks, an energy minister, contended on Tuesday that the North Sea basin had been in decline over the past two decades, informing BBC Radio 4’s *Today* programme that there existed a “vast prospect for us in alternative technologies.”