This text is an on-site model of Free Lunch e-newsletter. Premium subscribers can join right here to get the e-newsletter delivered each Thursday and Sunday. Commonplace subscribers can improve to Premium right here, or discover all FT newsletters
Welcome again. Subsequent week marks the primary anniversary of the UK Labour social gathering’s return to energy after 14 years in opposition. Financial development is the federal government’s “primary mission”, in accordance with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.
This week I assess Labour’s progress on that mission, define what it ought to do subsequent and, with the assistance of distinguished thinkers on the UK economic system, supply 5 coverage suggestions.
Since Labour got here to energy in July 2024, the UK economic system has grown by 0.89 per cent as much as April this 12 months. There are greater than 1 / 4 of one million fewer payrolled staff, in accordance with Could 2025 information from HMRC. Financial exercise throughout all main sectors has fallen, and enterprise and shopper confidence have flatlined.
Britain has been buffeted by international financial uncertainty. Nonetheless, the numbers to this point mirror poorly in opposition to the federal government’s mission.
A part of this comes all the way down to Labour’s development technique. “Its focus has been funding,” says Giles Wilkes, a senior fellow on the Institute for Authorities. “This has meant placing funds in direction of public providers, infrastructure and defence.”
As I outlined in the June 1 version of this text, under-investment is central to Britain’s subdued productiveness development. Assuming the funds allotted by chancellor Rachel Reeves are spent effectively, the expansion charge ought to rise over the long run. However the authorities has performed little to spice up financial exercise within the close to time period.
In its first Funds in October 2024, Labour raised day-to-day spending for Britain’s strained public providers. After promising to not improve taxes on “working individuals”, it selected to cowl its spending shortfall by elevating levies on employers, funding and the rich. Reeves additionally left a small buffer in opposition to her fundamental fiscal rule to steadiness the present finances.
This left the federal government reliant on development to drive up revenues and maintain fiscal headroom. However with larger taxes straining financial exercise within the close to time period, and the majority of Labour’s development agenda centered in direction of the long run, that technique has been uncovered.
Reeves’ buffer has come beneath stress. And as latest U-turns on deliberate cuts to winter gasoline funds and welfare present, the social gathering is struggling to make financial savings. This maintains the spectre of upper taxes, which crimps companies and funding much more.
Except financial exercise picks up quickly, Britain dangers falling ever deeper right into a spiral of rising taxes and decrease development.
“The important thing now could be clear and constant signalling to corporations, the market and traders that the setting within the close to future shall be much more predictable and enterprise pleasant,” stated William Wright, managing director of the New Monetary think-tank.
Basically, Labour must revive animal spirits rapidly, cheaply and with out irking extra voters. How? I requested UK coverage consultants. Right here’s what they stated:
Turbocharge planning reforms
The federal government has made efforts to streamline the planning system, however Sam Dumitriu, head of coverage at Britain Remade, says it may be extra bold and focused.
He urges the federal government to emulate New Zealand and “mechanically grant planning permission for brand new six- to eight-storey housing in costly cities close to good public transport infrastructure”.
Likewise, Ben Hopkinson, head of housing and infrastructure on the Centre for Coverage Research, provides that the UK ought to return to explicitly linking housing and infrastructure tasks. From the Eighties to 1933, the Metropolitan Railway would purchase land close to proposed prepare routes, prolong the railway after which promote the higher-value land for improvement.
“Right now main infrastructure tasks can solely collectively consent as much as 500 houses, a restrict so low this capacity is sort of by no means used,” says Hopkinson. “The housing secretary might scrap this restrict tomorrow. That may allow new houses to be constructed alongside new supporting infrastructure.”
Cut back or abolish stamp obligation on shares
Stamp Obligation Reserve Tax is levied on the acquisition of UK-listed firm shares at 0.5 per cent. No nation with a main monetary centre expenses transactions as excessive as Britain does, if in any respect.
A 2024 research by Oxera discovered that the tax diminished complete pension financial savings at retirement, raised the price of fairness and restricted capital expenditure.
It reckons abolishing SDRT might increase GDP completely by between 0.2 and 0.7 per cent. For measure, this might increase the annual tax take by as much as £6.8bn. SDRT presently brings in £3.8bn in receipts.
Introduce an ‘innovation visa’
The UK has one of the vital costly and burdensome visa programs for gifted, high-skilled people throughout superior economies.
Anna McShane, founding father of the New Britain Undertaking think-tank, recommends introducing a particular invitation-only visa mannequin, based mostly on Australia’s Nationwide Innovation Visa.
Even when just for a restricted interval, it will supply a low-cost, fast-track route for gifted people to completely work, conduct analysis or begin a enterprise in precedence UK sectors. As regional hubs for innovation, Britain’s world-class universities and analysis establishments might assist administer them.
Tim Leunig, chief economist at Nesta, concurs, and provides that giving research-intensive universities the power to challenge visas would encourage them to scout for expertise globally.
Repair cliff-edges within the revenue tax system
Kinks in Britain’s revenue tax system end in punitive marginal tax charges. Two are significantly problematic.
First, the lack of tax-free childcare assist if one father or mother’s adjusted web revenue exceeds £100,000 every year. (My colleagues Claer Barrett and Emma Agyemang wrote about this in March.) Second, the 60 per cent marginal tax charge for these incomes between £100,000 and £125,000, as the non-public allowance is tapered.
“These excessive marginal charges encourage staff to restrict their earnings by decreasing their hours or by making outsized pension contributions,” notes Dan Neidle, a UK tax professional.
The federal government might scrap the restrict on childcare assist by making it common. This might most likely value within the low a whole bunch of thousands and thousands, in accordance with Institute for Fiscal Research estimates.
The federal government might decide to fixing different cliff-edges as a part of a longer-term sign to staff. “The non-public allowance might be tapered over an extended stretch of revenue, probably at little value to the exchequer,” says Neidle, concerning the excessive marginal tax charge above £100,000.

Reform the Particular person Financial savings Accounts system
The mixed property of Britain’s Isa system — a type of tax-free saving on as much as £20,000 per particular person every year — are value round £775bn, greater than the overall worth of outlined contribution pension property, in accordance with New Monetary.
It recommends simplifying the system — which incorporates money and fairness funding merchandise — right into a single wrapper rebranded as an “funding and financial savings account”. New Monetary reckons this alone might encourage a further £5.4bn to be invested in stocks-and-shares Isas every year, serving to to spice up Britain’s retail investor market and liquidity.
Over time the federal government might discover splitting the annual allowance evenly, with any money Isa financial savings above £10,000 solely eligible for tax breaks if invested. For measure, New Monetary finds that 80 per cent of money Isa customers save lower than that quantity every year anyway.
These reforms aren’t excellent, however given Labour’s constraints, they’re pragmatic methods to spark enterprise and investor confidence. Ship your coverage suggestions to freelunch@ft.com or on X @tejparikh90.
For a celebration with one of many largest majorities in UK historical past, there was a singular alternative to embark on main reforms and cost-cutting.
In spite of everything, large tax measures would go additional to spice up development and vital spending cuts would keep at bay the continuing risk of upper taxes. I’ll return to those in a future e-newsletter.
As a substitute, Labour’s first 12 months will go down as a serious missed alternative for the UK economic system. It has lacked boldness, and with its lack of enterprise expertise, the UK cupboard has neglected the important position of maintaining the personal sector onside.
The funk round Britain has locked the nation into weak financial exercise, politically strenuous cost-cutting and better taxes. To flee its personal entice, Labour should discover a solution to enhance animal spirits.
Meals for thought
Ambiguity is unhealthy for the economic system. This paper quantifies how poorly written laws harms funding, raises prices and slows development.
Free Lunch on Sunday is edited by Harvey Nriapia
Really useful newsletters for you
Commerce Secrets and techniques — A must-read on the altering face of worldwide commerce and globalisation. Join right here
Unhedged — Robert Armstrong dissects a very powerful market tendencies and discusses how Wall Road’s finest minds reply to them. Join right here