Unlock the Editor’s Digest at no cost
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been warned by MPs that subsequent week’s spending evaluate is a “make or break” second for the federal government’s pledge to ship 1.5mn new houses in England throughout this parliament, as bitter negotiations over Whitehall budgets entered their remaining part.
Angela Rayner, deputy prime minister, is holding out for extra money for her division, which funds native authorities and housing, forward of the conclusion of Reeves’ spending evaluate on June 11.
Rayner was aided in her combat on Wednesday when the cross-party Home of Commons housing and native authorities choose committee printed a letter to Reeves urging her to take care of spending on social and inexpensive housing.
“The spending evaluate 2025 is make or break for the 1.5mn goal,” mentioned Florence Eshalomi, Labour chair of the committee, calling for a “generational improve in social and inexpensive housing funding”.
Rayner’s allies hope inexpensive housing will proceed to be effectively funded as a result of it counts as capital expenditure, which has been prioritised by Reeves as she units out spending plans for the remainder of the parliament.
Whereas Rayner’s day-to-day price range is being squeezed with critical knock-on results for native authorities companies, Reeves final yr tweaked her fiscal guidelines to permit an additional £113bn of borrowing for funding over the parliament.
Rayner, residence secretary Yvette Cooper and vitality secretary Ed Miliband are the final three ministers nonetheless holding out for extra money from the Treasury.
Reeves set out a tight “spending envelope” for the remainder of the parliament in final yr’s Funds. Total day-to-day departmental spending will improve 1.2 per cent in actual phrases a yr on common from 2026-27.
Veteran former Treasury spending negotiators warned on Wednesday the trio are taking a threat by holding out to the bitter finish, with the likelihood that they’ve a price range settlement imposed on them.
David Gauke, former Conservative Treasury chief secretary, mentioned “spending ministers” will often at this stage invoke the assist of the prime minister, presenting a dilemma for Sir Keir Starmer.
“For those who get into the behavior as prime minister of undermining the Treasury, that creates ethical hazard for future spending rounds,” Gauke mentioned. “The prime minister is underneath stress to facet with the chancellor and chief secretary.”
Gauke mentioned generally political or exterior public stress — for instance current lobbying by police chiefs for extra money — may assist a minister, however finally the Treasury may merely impose a remaining settlement.
He mentioned there was an opportunity the chancellor would possibly discover some “cash behind the couch” on the final minute, however added: “For those who don’t like what you get, you need to settle for it or you need to stroll.”
Sir Danny Alexander, former Liberal Democrat Treasury chief secretary and an architect of the austerity imposed by the 2010-15 coalition authorities, mentioned as extra ministers settled their budgets, these holding out have been left preventing for what was left within the pot.
“The spending envelope is about prematurely,” he mentioned. “If everybody else has settled, you’re left with the residual. The true threat is that the settlement you get is out of your management.”
Alexander mentioned Lord Ken Clarke, Tory justice secretary within the Coalition authorities, was the final to settle within the 2010 spending spherical. “Recollections differ on whether or not it was agreed or imposed,” he mentioned.
One Labour veteran mentioned generally holding out till the top may power final minute concessions, noting in direction of the tail-end of Gordon Brown’s authorities Cooper, then work and pensions secretary, had settled “at about 2.30am” the night time earlier than the conclusion of a spending evaluate.
Each Cooper and Miliband labored on the Treasury and are the one members of Starmer’s cupboard who have been additionally in Brown’s senior ranks.
The Labour veteran argued Rayner didn’t have the identical size of ministerial expertise however was as a substitute burnishing her personal management credentials.
“I believe she’s somewhat totally different as a result of she isn’t simply holding out for the division, she’s holding out for extra political causes,” they mentioned.
