‘We’ve received to not speak ourselves right into a spiral of collapse’

Strolling across the cobbled streets of Temple, London’s historic authorized district and a stone’s throw from the Royal Courts of Justice, is a vacationer’s fantasy. With the Twelfth-century Temple Church at its centre, and gowned barristers flitting between the courts and their chambers, it feels as if in case you have stepped again in time to a Charles Dickens novel.

It’s subsequently becoming that, on an unseasonably sizzling June day, I’m assembly the realm’s primary character, the Woman Chief Justice, Sue Carr. Strolling round Inside Temple Backyard, Carr tells me that — like every prime barrister throughout her temporary — she has learn each of the Lunch with the FT books “cowl to cowl” in preparation for our assembly. Nonetheless, if she is fearful about placing a foot mistaken, it doesn’t present.

Given the silence that presides over the English judiciary, the place judges usually are not politically appointed and, for essentially the most half, not allowed to talk publicly, Carr — as head of the judiciary and president of the courts for England and Wales — is one among its few voices, and she or he hardly ever offers interviews. A fast tally of the issues she has been confronting offers some clue as to why.

Since 2023, when she turned the primary lady to carry the place in its practically 800-year historical past, Carr has been coping with report prison courtroom backlogs, courtroom buildings leaking and crumbling, political over-reach, armchair judges on social media weighing in on circumstances, and an unprecedented degree of threats to judicial security.

“It appears like each time I see a lightweight on the finish of the tunnel, it’s an oncoming practice,” she says.

We end our stroll reverse the backyard on the Pegasus Bar & Restaurant, a widely known lunch spot for barristers and judges. On a recce to the eatery earlier than our assembly, I’m advised by one of many waiters that it’s a terrific place to listen in on a few of the nation’s prime attorneys as they vent and console one another over their newest judicial dressing-down or failed case.

Our assembly is going down on a Friday and I inform her that readers usually complain a few dry FT Lunch. She gamely agrees to separate a bottle of wine and, to my aid, reschedules her subsequent assembly to present us extra time to sip our Picpoul. “Right here’s to your profession,” she says as we clink glasses.

Over olives and bread with a scrumptious Netherend butter from Gloucestershire, we settle in.

The Temple precinct has been the backdrop to a lot of Carr’s life. She was a common business barrister at close by chambers, earlier than shifting to turn out to be a Excessive Courtroom decide throughout the highway, and was married within the church. The backyard was fairly actually her stage in 1988 when, as a younger barrister, she performed Helena in A Midsummer Evening’s Dream alongside Woman Simler, one among solely two present feminine Supreme Courtroom judges, as Hermia.

Like Shakespeare’s play, Carr’s job has had a surreal high quality at occasions. Over the previous yr, she has publicly admonished UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer for overstepping constitutional boundaries and confronted criticism of the judiciary for being “woke”.

If you happen to mirror again 10 or 15 years in the past, who would have thought that the judiciary would have been accused of being woke?

In February, Tory get together chief Kemi Badenoch mentioned to Starmer in parliament {that a} decide’s resolution regarding a household from Gaza, who had been granted the fitting to reside within the UK after they initially utilized below a scheme for Ukrainians, was “utterly mistaken. It can’t be allowed to face”. Starmer agreed it was “the mistaken resolution”, although he added the choice had been taken below the earlier authorities’s authorized framework.

Following the alternate, Carr mentioned that it was “unacceptable” to make such public remarks, and that it conflicted with the responsibility of politicians to respect judicial independence.

This led to a deluge of headlines and she or he needed to fend off unwelcome commentary even from inside her personal ranks. I ask how she felt about former Supreme Courtroom decide Lord Jonathan Sumption telling a radio station that her remarks over the debacle had been a “mistake”.

“No person really is aware of what was happening in these few days aside from me,” she says. “I’ve received immigration judges who’re terrified, who’ve needed to transfer out of their properties, who aren’t sending their youngsters to high school . . . For the judges it was a vital second for them that anyone spoke out . . . I might do it once more in a heartbeat.”

Carr’s German mom is her staunchest defender in such moments. Anybody overheard talking badly of “Susie” within the grocery store will get an earful from the 86-year-old, she tells me.

Past assaults on immigration judges, Carr has additionally needed to grapple with the unprecedented resolution by the earlier authorities to make use of laws, relatively than the courts, to quash the convictions of lots of of sub-postmasters within the wake of the Put up Workplace scandal, deemed one of many greatest miscarriages of justice in British historical past.

About 700 sub-postmasters had been convicted for alleged offences, together with theft and fraud, in circumstances introduced by the Put up Workplace, utilizing knowledge from a defective IT system.

Carr was vocal in regards to the scenario on the time, telling MPs that the courtroom may have dealt with giant numbers of appeals towards Put up Workplace convictions, regardless of the backlogs, and pushing again on the concept emergency laws was the one strategy to cope with it. “The frustration for us was that we may have accomplished the job,” she says.

The Put up Workplace instance is only one of a rising tide of circumstances that has led to social media debate about prosecutions and a whole lot of “decide bashing”. The conviction of nurse Lucy Letby in 2023 for murdering new child infants, after which questions have been raised in regards to the proof offered to the courtroom, is one other instance of a case that has captured the general public creativeness.

Carr says that there is no such thing as a situation with individuals scrutinising judgments, however such public debate, a lot of it inevitably uninformed, offers her concern over judicial security. In a latest survey, practically 40 per cent of judges in England and Wales mentioned that they felt unsafe in courtroom.

“The purpose [isn’t] you may’t criticise judgments,” says Carr, including later that “it was fairly telling that within the final UK Judicial Attitudes Survey . . . lower than 10 per cent of the judiciary felt valued by authorities. That makes me unhappy.”

Is she involved that this pattern for such public dialogue about circumstances, alongside criticisms of “woke judges” from the rightwing media, may lead politicians to intrude extra with the judicial course of?

“Even when it leads anyone such as you to ask the query, there’s the chance,” she says, including: “If you happen to mirror again 10 or 15 years in the past, who would have thought that the judiciary would have been accused of being woke?”

I believed, that’s why I’ve received to take it on, to present ‘Woman’ the identical gravitas, the identical standing, the identical energy

The starters arrive. I’ve opted for the Greek salad particular and Carr has gone for the cured salmon. I realise we’ve barely made a dent in our bread and olives.

With the entire political mayhem and the challenges going through the courts, why did she need to take up the chief justice job in any respect?

“I bear in mind being in chambers as soon as after I was nonetheless on the Bar, standing subsequent to a photocopier, and a [senior barrister] stood subsequent to me and mentioned, ‘You will be the primary Woman Chief Justice’ . . . I will need to have been about 45,” she says. “We simply laughed and I mentioned you’re being completely ridiculous, and I did suppose it was ridiculous.”

Writing the appliance, nonetheless, made her realise that she wished to do it. Together with her three youngsters grown up, after which in her late fifties, it appeared like there would by no means be a greater second. She was the truth is reportedly on a shortlist of two girls in the long run.

As the primary lady to take up the position she needed to decide about what to name herself — whether or not to maintain the Lord Chief Justice title or recognise her gender.

“Once I thought of it, I requested myself, ‘Why does Lord Chief Justice sound so nice?’ Nicely, really, for all of the mistaken causes, as a result of ‘Lord’ is related to standing and energy and command . . . I believed, that’s why I’ve received to take it on, to present ‘Woman’ the identical gravitas, the identical standing, the identical energy,” she says. “My youngsters really wished me to be ‘Chief [Justice]’ . . . [because it’s] extra progressive,” she provides.

I ask if she’s fearful in regards to the “glass cliff” concept — the place girls or ethnic minorities are appointed to positions of energy throughout occasions of disaster in an organisation and subsequently set as much as fail.

She says that the truth is she was optimistic after Covid-19 in regards to the trajectory forward of her, and thought “genuinely it was going to be fairly calm”. However coping with the problems round “constitutional boundaries [such as the government’s interference in the Post Office] virtually as instantly as I used to be . . . that was a shock.”

Carr is decided to make use of her place to pave the best way for others and has made enhancing variety on the Bar and within the judiciary — a notoriously pale, stale male atmosphere — one among her key priorities.

She has her work reduce out. Within the newest spherical of silk appointments — the elite King’s Counsel kitemark awarded to the nation’s prime barristers — there have been no profitable Black candidates. Solely 5 girls, together with her Shakespeare companion Simler, have ever sat on the UK Supreme Courtroom bench because it was created practically 16 years in the past.

For our primary course, I’ve the roasted harissa aubergine with tabbouleh salad, whereas Carr opts for the chargrilled chilli prawn skewers, which she declares “scrumptious”. She tells me that she will not be a foodie and is “a extremely dangerous prepare dinner”, aside from HelloFresh meals — dinners that arrive in a field with easy-to-follow recipes — enjoying into the barrister stereotype that she is nice at following directions.

Carr’s childhood was “glad”, with sturdy ties to her German grandparents in Bremen. Her father, Richard Carr, is a former director and board member of Arsenal Soccer Membership, and the household, “nonetheless a treasured a part of the Arsenal neighborhood”, go to matches commonly, the place she typically bumps into Starmer, one other Arsenal fan.

Dwelling life in west London is easy. She has “an infinite quantity of power, I don’t want a lot sleep”, and wakes early in order that she will get to her desk round 7am. She has a pad and pen by the mattress every night time and says that her superpower is a capability to jot down ideas coherently in the dead of night, which used to lead to “the killer cross-examination query” when she was a barrister, and now offers her one thing like “a extremely good theme for a speech”.

A proficient linguist, Carr speaks German and French fluently and, in an indication of her dedication to the temporary as head of each the English and Welsh judiciary, she is studying Welsh.

Her linguistic abilities have turn out to be useful in her position as an envoy for the English courts overseas by way of programmes such because the Standing Worldwide Discussion board of Industrial Courts, which brings collectively courts from practically 60 jurisdictions to share practices. She has a number of chief justice counterparts — in Canada, New Zealand, Northern Eire — whom she calls on for steerage at occasions.

It’s clear that the English courts can’t proceed of their present state. Prison trials in London are actually being scheduled for 2029 due to the backlogs, elevating issues in regards to the fading recollections of witnesses. And funding is one other problem; I inform Carr that one high-profile prison barrister advised me lately that they didn’t see how the Prison Bar would exist in a decade’s time.

Carr counters that it’s potential to make a good dwelling as a prison barrister “for those who work onerous”, and that there are many initiatives below strategy to attempt to higher help younger individuals coming into the occupation. It’s “nonetheless one of many biggest jobs on the earth”, she says.

The cash resourcing scenario is fairly difficult, however I received’t, I simply received’t, permit that to jeopardise all the good things

As somebody who has been a courtroom reporter on and off for the previous 15 years, I say I used to be delighted that Southwark Crown Courtroom, London’s primary venue for white-collar crime trials, had lately put in water coolers. Nonetheless, many of the bathrooms nonetheless don’t flush.

An unbiased assessment of the prison courts is because of be revealed imminently and is anticipated to advocate that some jury trials be rolled again in order that magistrates alone can cope with sure offences in an effort to hurry up circumstances. Such a suggestion is probably controversial given the sanctity of jury trials and an individual’s proper to be tried by their friends.

“The cash resourcing scenario is fairly difficult and tough, however I received’t, I simply received’t, permit that to jeopardise all the good things . . . We’ve received to not speak ourselves right into a spiral of collapse,” Carr says.

Although authorized companies is a giant income generator for the UK (the sector was valued at £44bn in 2022) and the nation has a worldwide popularity for its respect for the rule of legislation, justice will not be a vote winner as a result of it’s much less seen to many of the voters than areas akin to well being and schooling. Whereas Carr has a sympathetic ear in Starmer, a former human rights barrister who, she says, “completely will get it” in the case of the significance of justice, he’s in fact beholden to political issues.

Carr’s supreme state of affairs could be for justice funding to be ringfenced over the subsequent many years to assist resolve issues just like the backlogs — now at about 77,000 prison circumstances — and that the knock-on results of underfunding are the truth is very actual for individuals.

“If households can resolve their divorce and their little one preparations higher, their youngsters can be more healthy, happier, extra prone to get jobs, much less prone to commit crimes. They, the dad and mom, can be more healthy, happier, extra productive at work,” she says.

The issues usually are not simply in Britain. Many nations are coping with the results of a deprioritised justice system, whereas assaults on the rule of legislation and the US judiciary below President Donald Trump have been felt globally.

Carr says she has little interplay with US judges, though one among her heroes is the late US Supreme Courtroom justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Is she contemplating some “LCJ” merch just like the “Infamous RBG” T-shirts and tote baggage that turned a cult phenomenon?

“Oh, have you ever not heard? I need to open a store within the RCJ . . . I’m going to make some baseball caps,” she says — an concept that she is critically pursuing — rapidly including that these won’t characteristic photos of her.

We’re two hours in and Carr doesn’t have time for dessert or espresso. She’s eager to take me to see contained in the Inside Temple — one of many 4 skilled associations that barristers in England and Wales belong to — and Temple Church, rapidly earlier than she has to go away.

Carr has been sitting for a portrait in latest months and she or he reveals me the place it’s going to hold. She’s opted for a “fashionable working lady” look, she says, as a result of the chief justice robes “had been made for males” and don’t match. Viscount Harcourt, one among a sea of white males on the wall, can be getting the boot to make means for her portray.

There is no such thing as a mounted tenure on the LCJ job. Carr’s predecessor held the place for six years, one of many longest occupancies in many years. How lengthy does she need to keep in publish? “[Until] I do one thing catastrophically mistaken,” she replies. “[Or] cease having fun with it.”

Suzi Ring is the FT’s authorized correspondent in London

Discover out about our newest tales first — comply with FT Weekend on Instagram, Bluesky and X, and enroll to obtain the FT Weekend e-newsletter each Saturday morning