For nearly a decade, Mike Trout was the unquestioned finest participant in baseball.
From 2012 to 2019, he received the American League MVP award thrice and completed second within the voting 4 occasions. Within the years he did not win, he led the AL thrice in WAR; in 2017, he led the AL in OBP, slugging and OPS, however he sat out a while and completed a mere fourth within the voting; and in 2018, it took a herculean season from Mookie Betts to beat out Trout in what was one in all Trout’s finest seasons. Actually, he wasn’t that far-off from successful eight consecutive MVPs.
However since then, it feels as if we have been robbed of the second half of the profession of one of many recreation’s all-time greats. Trout has been injured a lot of the time since 2021, taking part in in solely about 42% of the video games the Los Angeles Angels have performed. Proper now, he is injured once more due to a bone bruise in his left knee; when he has performed this season, he cracked 9 residence runs in 29 video games however was additionally hitting simply .179. He had comparable leads to the 29 video games he performed earlier than tearing the meniscus in his left knee final season, when he hit .220 with 10 residence runs. Admitting the accidents and Trout’s age — he is 33 — have caught him up, the Angels lastly moved him off heart subject this season.
These extended absences have allowed Betts, who continues to play at a excessive stage and ranks third amongst place gamers in WAR this decade, to slowly shut the hole on Trout. It is now an argument to contemplate: Is Betts poised to go Trout as the very best participant of their technology?
First, we have to outline what “their technology” is. When generations are mentioned in demographic phrases, the division is finished by beginning years, often lasting 15 to twenty years or so. Trout was born in 1991, so beneath this definition, his “technology” might prolong all the best way from gamers born within the Seventies to the late 2000s and embody the likes of Derek Jeter (born in 1974), Alex Rodriguez (1975), Albert Pujols (1980), Clayton Kershaw (1988), Juan Soto (1998), Paul Skenes (2002) and Jackson Merrill (2003).
That is a broad swath of beginning dates — too broad. As a substitute, let’s categorize generational worth utilizing the identical years as outlined in popular culture — Child Boomers, Gen X, and so forth. — however with a twist: worth collected solely in these particular years (not the years during which the gamers have been born).
It is a thought train as a lot as a hardcore statistical examine, as a result of we do discuss generations (or eras) on a regular basis in baseball — the useless ball period, the steroid period, the wild-card period and so forth. As we take a deeper dive into how Trout and Betts evaluate, let’s additionally undergo every technology to see which gamers dominated these intervals within the sport, ending with the nice Technology Alpha debate between Trout and Betts (and sure, Aaron Decide and Shohei Ohtani may pop up, too).
Trout vs. Betts by the numbers
Trout was piling up a lot WAR at such a younger age that we used to do month-to-month updates on all of the gamers he had simply handed on the profession WAR record. His run started as a rookie in 2012 in his age-20 season, when he hit .326 with 30 residence runs and led the AL in runs scored and stolen bases. And for a very long time, he regarded destined to develop into one of many biggest gamers of all time — the interior circle of the interior circle. Take a look at the place he ranked on the profession WAR leaderboard for place gamers via every age:
Age 20, 2012 season: 11.0 (second behind Mel Ott)
Age 21, 2013: 19.9 (first, forward of Ott)
Age 22, 2014: 27.6 (first, forward of Ty Cobb and Ott)
Age 23, 2015: 37.1 (first, forward of Cobb and Ted Williams)
Age 24, 2016: 47.5 (first, forward of Cobb and Mickey Mantle)
Age 25, 2017: 54.4 (second, behind Cobb)
Age 26, 2018: 64.3 (first, forward of Cobb and Mantle)
Age 27, 2019: 72.2 (first, forward of Cobb and Mantle)
Then, beginning with the COVID-shortened 2020 season, Trout’s tempo took a downturn.
Age 28, 2020: 74.0 (fourth, behind Cobb, Rogers Hornsby and Mantle)
Age 29, 2021: 75.9 (sixth, now behind Ott and Alex Rodriguez)
Age 30, 2022: 82.0 (fifth, climbing again forward of Ott)
Age 31, 2023: 84.9 (tenth, with Babe Ruth, Henry Aaron and Willie Mays passing him)
Age 32, 2024: 86.0 (fifteenth, with Barry Bonds leaping forward for the primary time)
This takes us to 2025, Trout’s age-33 season. He is at present squeezed on the all-time record between Jimmie Foxx and Eddie Mathews — two gamers, coincidentally, who had already compiled greater than 89% of their profession WAR whole via their age-32 seasons.
In the meantime, with Trout sitting out so many video games prior to now a number of years, Betts began making a run at Trout for finest participant of their technology. Trout nonetheless has a big lead in lifetime WAR, 85.8 to 72.2, however contemplate Betts’ benefits on this statistical chase:
He is a yr youthful (Trout was born in August 1991, Betts in October 1992).
He is taking part in at a better stage, averaging 7.8 WAR per 162 video games since 2022, in comparison with 6.2 for Trout (we went again to 2022 to incorporate Trout’s excessive charge of manufacturing that season).
He clearly has stayed on the sector far more, taking part in 579 video games since 2021 in comparison with 295 for Trout.
His potential to maneuver to shortstop means he’ll proceed to build up extra defensive worth.
And Betts has additionally been extremely constant within the age/WAR chart:
By way of age 23: 18.1 (thirty third)
By way of age 26: 42.5 (twenty first)
By way of age 29: 57.0 (twenty eighth)
By way of age 31: 70.3 (twenty fourth)
Betts took a small dip via age 29 as a result of COVID-shortened season after which had the worst season of his profession in 2021, when he produced 4.1 WAR (nonetheless a robust season for many gamers), however he bounced again with 6.7, 8.6 and 4.8 WAR over the following three seasons. (That 2024 variety of 4.8 WAR got here in 116 video games, as he sat out time due to a damaged hand after getting hit by a pitch).
He isn’t off to a scorching begin in 2025, however he is nonetheless on tempo for an additional 6-win season. If he does try this this season and subsequent, he can be round 83 profession WAR on the finish of 2026, his age-33 season, which might transfer him into twentieth within the rankings at that age — simply behind the place Trout sits.
There is not any assure how Betts will age into his late 30s, however one key attribute he has been capable of keep as he will get older is his contact potential. The truth is, the bottom strikeout charges of Betts’ profession have been 2024 (11.0%) and 2025 (9.2%). Trout, in the meantime, has posted his worst strikeout charges in 2023 (28.7%) and 2025 (29.8%). These numbers level to Betts persevering with to age nicely and submit respectable offensive numbers whereas Trout in all probability will proceed to submit low batting averages blended in with some residence runs.
It makes Betts catching Trout really feel attainable, except Trout has a profession renaissance. Historical past may present how unlikely that’s. Mantle and Ken Griffey Jr., two different all-time nice heart fielders, battled accidents of their 30s and have been by no means capable of reclaim their previous glory. Mantle had simply 11.9 WAR from age 33 on, and Griffey had simply 6.4.
The place do Decide and Ohtani slot in? Again to Technology Alpha in a second, after we glance again at how the debates over previous generations’ biggest gamers performed out.
Generational breakdown
Asking “Who’s the best participant?” is not essentially a simple query with a easy reply. There could be three alternative ways to strategy this:
Who has essentially the most collected worth on this interval? We’ll use WAR, as we did above with Trout and Betts.
Who has the very best peak stage of efficiency over a shorter variety of seasons? Trout dominated the game for eight seasons.
Who’s essentially the most iconic participant of this technology? That is a fuzzier notion, nevertheless it’s extra about which participant will probably be most remembered or who finest defines the actual period.
We’ll dig into all three of these for every technology. Let’s begin again in 1901.
The Best Technology (1901-27)
Prime 5 in WAR
Walter Johnson: 155.1
Ty Cobb: 149.4
Tris Speaker: 134.4
Babe Ruth: 133.5
Eddie Collins: 124.2
Subsequent 5: Honus Wagner (113.8), Grover Alexander (111.3), Christy Mathewson (101.1), Rogers Hornsby (100.8), Nap Lajoie: 89.3
Finest peak: 1. Ruth, 1921-27 (10.3 common WAR per season); 2. Johnson, 1912-19 (11.5 common WAR per season); 3. Hornsby, 1920-25 (9.9 common WAR per season, hit .397)
Most iconic participant: Ruth
This technology’s largest debate: Cobb and the useless ball period vs. Ruth and the house run
Ruth, after all, had further worth past 1927 that pushed him previous Cobb in profession WAR. However the concept that Ruth was the superior participant wasn’t essentially the consensus view till round possibly 1960 or so — and, after all, fashionable metrics now clearly present Ruth because the extra useful participant. Within the first Corridor of Fame vote in 1936, Cobb acquired extra votes and plenty of contemporaries appreciated him in an period of extra “scientific” baseball.
“The Babe was an important ballplayer, positive, however Cobb was even better. Babe might knock your brains out, however Cobb would drive you loopy,” stated Speaker, who performed towards each.
The Silent Technology (1928-45)
Prime 5 in WAR
Mel Ott: 111.8
Lefty Grove: 98.0
Lou Gehrig: 91.2
Jimmie Foxx: 90.9
Charlie Gehringer: 79.9
Subsequent 5: Arky Vaughan (75.9), Carl Hubbell (68.8), Joe Cronin (64.5), Paul Waner (62.2), Babe Ruth (58.9)
Finest peak: 1. Ruth, 1928-32 (9.5 common WAR per season); 2. Gehrig, 1930-36 (8.8 common WAR per season, averaged 155 RBIs); 3. Grove, 1928-33 (8.8 common WAR per season, averaged 25 wins)
Most iconic: Ruth/Gehrig/Joe DiMaggio
This technology’s largest debate: DiMaggio vs. Ted Williams
That is how good Ruth was: He cracked the highest 10 in profession worth in two totally different generations, together with that monster five-year stretch when he hit .348/.475/.701 and topped the AL 4 occasions in WAR whereas averaging 47 residence runs and 150 RBIs. Ott’s profession completely overlaps with this timeline, as his first full season was as a 19-year-old with the New York Giants in 1928 and his final as an everyday was in 1945. He was a really nice — and underrated — participant however hardly ever remembered now.
However essentially the most compelling debate kicked off close to the top of this technology. DiMaggio reached the majors in 1936 and the Yankees instantly received 4 straight World Collection after which one other in 1941. Williams reached the majors in 1939 and hit .406 in 1941 — and completed second within the MVP voting to DiMaggio (who had his 56-game hitting streak that season). Who was higher? Are DiMaggio’s World Collection rings extra spectacular than Williams’ statistical superiority? The participant with the document hitting streak or the final participant to hit .400? The controversy would proceed into the early years of the following technology (Williams received the Triple Crown in 1947, however DiMaggio once more received MVP honors).
Child Boomers (1946-64)
Prime 5 in WAR
Willie Mays: 108.9
Stan Musial: 104.1
Mickey Mantle: 98.4
Warren Spahn: 92.5
Ted Williams: 87.7
Subsequent 5: Eddie Mathews (85.9), Henry Aaron (80.8), Robin Roberts (80.6), Duke Snider (65.9), Richie Ashburn (64.3)
Finest peak: 1. Mays, 1954-64 (9.4 common WAR per season for over a decade); 2. Mantle, 1955-58 (10.2 common WAR per season); 3. Williams, 1946-1949 (9.4 common WAR per season)
Most iconic: Mantle
This technology’s largest debate: Mays vs. Mantle
Mays over Musial and Mantle as the very best participant of the Child Boomer technology is not a slam dunk. Musial will get two of his three MVP awards on this time-frame and Mantle will get all three of his; Mays received just one (together with his second coming in 1965). Musial additionally completed second within the MVP voting 4 occasions and had a slew of different top-10 finishes (as did Mays, after all). At his finest, Mantle was a greater hitter than Mays:
Mantle, 1954-64: .312/.440/.605, 397 HRs, 185 OPS+, 622 batting runs above common
Mays, 1954-64: .318/.392/.601, 429 HRs, 166 OPS+, 561 batting runs above common
As for iconic, it is Mantle over Mays, Musial and Williams with Jackie Robinson deserving an honorable point out as a distinct form of icon. Musial might need been the preferred participant throughout the game on the time. Mantle was within the World Collection nearly yearly with the Yankees, received seven of them, and even now, his baseball playing cards nonetheless carry the final word premium. Ask any Child Boomer: The Yankees outlined the Nineteen Fifties and Mantle outlined the Yankees.
Technology X (1965-80)
Prime 5 in WAR
Joe Morgan: 88.8
Tom Seaver: 88.8
Gaylord Perry: 84.0
Phil Niekro: 82.5
Carl Yastrzemski: 80.3
Subsequent 5: Ferguson Jenkins (78.2), Pete Rose (76.7), Johnny Bench (72.9), Reggie Jackson (70.0), Rod Carew (69.8)
Finest peak: 1. Morgan, 1972-76 (9.6 common WAR per season); 2. Bob Gibson, 1965-70 (7.6 common WAR per season, led all gamers in WAR 1968, 1969 and 1970); 3. Mike Schmidt, 1974-80 (8.2 common WAR per season)
Most iconic: Rose or Reggie … or Nolan Ryan?
This technology’s largest debate: Rose or Reggie … or Nolan Ryan?
This technology reveals how peak worth can cement a participant’s legacy. Gibson did not have the profession worth of fellow pitchers Perry or Niekro, however his legacy is far stronger. The truth is, that five-year peak can be even increased besides he broke his leg in 1967, solely to return and win three video games within the World Collection.
Probably the most iconic debate is the attention-grabbing one. All through the Seventies, Rose and Reggie have been the towering figures within the recreation — Charlie Hustle and Mr. October. They weren’t the very best gamers, however Rose was the preferred, Jackson extra controversial. Even Rose’s current reinstatement reveals how he continues to impression the headlines, even in loss of life. Ryan can be a late entry to the icon dialogue. He did not actually develop into an iconic determine till late in his profession with the Texas Rangers within the late Eighties and early Nineties — when he stored racking up no-hitters and strikeouts deep into his 40s — however he now possesses a larger-than-life persona that may even exceed Rose and Jackson.
Millennials (1981-96)
Prime 5 in WAR
Rickey Henderson: 95.7
Cal Ripken: 88.8
Wade Boggs: 88.2
Barry Bonds: 83.6
Roger Clemens: 80.8
Subsequent 5: Ryne Sandberg (67.1), Ozzie Smith (66.9), Tim Raines (66.5), Lou Whitaker (65.1), Alan Trammell (63.0)
Finest peak: 1. Bonds, 1990-96 (8.6 common WAR per season, three MVP awards); 2. Greg Maddux, 1992-96 (8.1 common WAR per season, 4 Cy Younger Awards); 3. Roger Clemens, 1986-92 (8.3 common WAR per season, three Cy Youngs)
Most iconic: Ken Griffey Jr.
This technology’s largest debate: Bonds vs. Griffey
Look … even pre-alleged-PED Bonds was a greater participant than Griffey. Bonds’ 1993 season, proper earlier than the offensive explosion throughout the game, was a season for the ages: .336/.458/.677, 9.9 WAR. He had an OPS+ of 206; from 1962 via 1993, solely 4 gamers had an OPS+ over 200: Willie McCovey in 1969, George Brett in 1980 and Bonds in 1992 and ’93.
From 1991 to 1998, Griffey’s peak, he averaged 7.2 WAR per season and led AL place gamers thrice in WAR. From 1990 to 1998, Bonds averaged 8.5 WAR and led NL place gamers seven occasions in WAR. Bonds received on base extra and was the higher base stealer, and although he did not play heart subject, he was a spectacular left fielder (particularly earlier in his profession with the Pittsburgh Pirates). In these pre-WAR days, the controversy was much more hotly contested and Griffey was usually thought to be the higher participant.
However most iconic? The Child in a landslide.
Technology Z (1997-2012)
Prime 5 in WAR
Alex Rodriguez: 107.0
Albert Pujols: 91.5
Barry Bonds: 79.1
Chipper Jones: 76.2
Randy Johnson: 74.1
Subsequent 5: Pedro Martinez (71.6), Scott Rolen (70.4), Derek Jeter (69.9), Roy Halladay (66.5), Carlos Beltran (65.5)
Finest peak: 1. Bonds, 2000-04 (10.2 common WAR per season, 4 MVP awards); 2. Johnson, 1999-2002 (9.5 common WAR per season, 4 straight Cy Younger Awards, averaged 354 strikeouts); 3. Martinez, 1997-2000 (9.4 common WAR per season, 2.16 ERA)
Most iconic: Jeter
This technology’s largest debate: Jeter vs. A-Rod
This period may high the others when it comes to peak performances. We might have additionally listed Rodriguez, who averaged 8.3 WAR and 46 residence runs from 1998 to 2005 (and that does not embody 9.4 WAR seasons in 1996 and 2007). Or Pujols, who had seven consecutive 8-plus WAR seasons from 2003 to 2009. Or Mark McGwire’s four-year run from 1996 to 1999, when he averaged 61 residence runs. Or Sammy Sosa averaging 58 residence runs in a five-year span. Or Ichiro Suzuki’s unimaginable 10 consecutive seasons with 200 hits.
However the Jeter/A-Rod debate takes in all the pieces about this difficult period. In the long run, Rodriguez had the numbers and Jeter had the rings and the fist pumps from the highest step of the dugout.
Technology Alpha (2010-25)
Prime 5 in WAR
Mike Trout: 85.8
Mookie Betts: 72.2
Max Scherzer: 71.9
Clayton Kershaw: 70.1
Justin Verlander: 65.8
Subsequent 5: Paul Goldschmidt (63.9), Freddie Freeman (62.7), Manny Machado (59.1), Nolan Arenado (57.4), Aaron Decide (56.4)
Finest peak: 1. Trout, 2012-19 (9.0 common WAR per season); 2. Shohei Ohtani (2021-??); 3. Aaron Decide (2022-??)
Most iconic: Umm …
Now we get again to Technology Alpha. There appears to be some disagreement on when it begins — possibly it is 2010, possibly 2012 or 2013. And possibly it ends in 2025 or 2027. However for this train, we began in 2010, which is handy when discussing Trout and Betts since their whole careers embody this time-frame.
Trout, even sitting out all that point in current seasons, holds the lead in profession WAR. What’s attention-grabbing is he isn’t but at 400 residence runs, 1,000 RBIs or near 2,000 hits, so his profession counting totals lag behind gamers with comparable WAR.
His worth at his peak was posting excessive on-base percentages and excessive slugging percentages within the 2010s, when offense was considerably down for a lot of the last decade. His profession wRC+, which makes these era-related changes, is 168, seventh all-time behind Ruth, Williams, Bonds, Gehrig, Hornsby and Mantle. That is with a cutoff of 5,000 plate appearances. If we decrease it to 4,500 plate appearances, Decide is available in third behind Ruth and Williams.
Ahh, sure, Decide and Ohtani. Each are near Trout and Betts in age (Decide is only some months youthful than Trout, and Ohtani was born in 1994, making him three years youthful). Neither made their debut till midway via this technology and are thus at present considerably behind in profession worth — Decide is at 56.4, Ohtani at 46.4. Each are accumulating it at Secretariat-like pace, however even when we prolong this generational interval just a few extra years, they will not catch Trout and even Betts in WAR inside the timeframe.
However most iconic? That is a debate. Trout, regardless of the MVP honors, has one postseason look manner again in 2014, a bunch of shedding seasons on a franchise that did not construct round him, and — truthful or not — by no means had that undefinable “it’ issue the best way Griffey did.
Perhaps essentially the most iconic is Decide, though he has by no means received a World Collection both, struggled for essentially the most half in his playoff appearances and his peak seasons are, for now, restricted to 2017, 2022, 2024 and 2025. Nonetheless, he appears to be enhancing at 33 years outdated; who is aware of what number of extra historic seasons he nonetheless has in him. Perhaps will probably be Ohtani, who’s now within the fifth season of his unicorn standing. He has pitched in three of these seasons, had the primary 50/50 season in 2024 that earned him his third MVP award and now he is possibly on his approach to a fourth MVP, particularly if he returns to pitching later this season, which remains to be the plan.
Or possibly it is even Betts. He has performed for 2 of the game’s glamour franchises: the Boston Crimson Sox and Los Angeles Dodgers. He has received an MVP, six Gold Gloves and 7 Silver Sluggers. He is additionally received three World Collection titles — and remains to be going robust. He is like Jeter in that he’ll do no matter it takes to win, like transferring from the outfield to second base or shortstop (and he already has extra profession WAR than Jeter).
The reply? Nicely, the reply is we nonetheless have lots of baseball for these guys to play — and that makes us all lucky baseball followers.
