The Trump administration has agreed to inject as much as $150 million into xLight, a semiconductor startup growing superior chip-making expertise, marking the third time the U.S. authorities has taken an fairness place in a personal startup and additional increasing a controversial technique that has put Washington on the cap tables of American corporations.
The Wall Road Journal reported Monday that the Commerce Division will present the funding to xLight in trade for an fairness stake that may probably make the federal government the startup’s largest shareholder. The deal makes use of funding from the 2022 Chips and Science Act and represents the primary Chips Act award in President Trump’s second time period, although it stays preliminary and topic to alter.
Earlier authorities fairness investments underneath the Trump administration embody publicly traded corporations Intel, MP Supplies, Lithium Americas, and Trilogy Metals. Two uncommon earths startups additionally secured funding in trade for fairness from the Commerce Division final month.
You possibly can think about how that is all going over in Silicon Valley, the place the libertarian ethos runs deep. At TechCrunch’s signature Disrupt occasion again in October, Sequoia Capital’s Roelof Botha jokingly supplied what could be the understatement of the 12 months when requested concerning the pattern: “[Some] of probably the most harmful phrases on the planet are: ‘I’m from the federal government, and I’m right here to assist.’”
Different VCs have equally expressed issues, if quietly, about what it means when their portfolio corporations are all of a sudden competing in opposition to startups backed by the U.S. Treasury, and even once they discover themselves sitting throughout the desk from authorities representatives at board conferences.
The four-year-old, Palo Alto, California, firm on the heart of this specific experiment is attempting to do one thing genuinely audacious in semiconductor manufacturing. XLight needs to construct particle accelerator-powered lasers — machines the scale of a soccer discipline, thoughts you — that might create extra highly effective and exact mild sources for making chips.
If it really works, it may problem the near-total dominance of ASML, the Dutch large that has been publicly traded since 1995 and at present enjoys an absolute monopoly on excessive ultraviolet lithography machines. (Its shares have surged 48.6% this 12 months.)
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
The CEO of xLight is Nicholas Kelez, a quantum computing and authorities labs veteran who presumably is aware of his means round a particle accelerator. Serving to this enterprise as government chairman is Pat Gelsinger, the previous Intel CEO who was proven the door late final 12 months after his bold manufacturing revival plans didn’t materialize.
“I wasn’t accomplished but,” Gelsinger — a normal companion at Playground World, which led the startup’s $40 million funding spherical this summer time — instructed the Journal, including that the trouble is “deeply private” to him.
Certainly, xLight doesn’t simply wish to compete with ASML however to go a lot additional. Whereas ASML’s machines work at wavelengths round 13.5 nanometers, xLight is focusing on 2 nanometers. Gelsinger claims the expertise may increase wafer processing effectivity by 30% to 40% whereas utilizing far much less power.
Because it occurs, each Kelez and Gelsinger will probably be holding forth at TechCrunch’s StrictlyVC occasion on Wednesday night time in Palo Alto, the place the federal government’s backing will little question come up. (You possibly can nonetheless nab a seat right here.)
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, for his half, insists that is all in service of nationwide safety and technological management, saying the partnership may “essentially rewrite the boundaries of chipmaking.” Critics will proceed to query whether or not taxpayer-funded fairness stakes symbolize visionary industrial coverage or state capitalism with a patriotic sheen, although even skeptics acknowledge the geopolitical actuality.
At the least Botha, who described himself at Disrupt as a “type of libertarian, free market thinker by nature,” conceded that industrial coverage has its place when nationwide pursuits demand it. “The one purpose the U.S. is resorting to it’s because we now have different nation states with whom we compete who’re utilizing industrial coverage to additional their industries which are strategic and possibly hostile to the U.S. in long-term pursuits.”
{content material}
Supply: {feed_title}