Audio of this article is brought to you by the Air & Space Forces Association, honoring and supporting our Airmen, Guardians, and their families. Find out more at afa.org
In a significant escalation of counterterrorism efforts in Africa, the U.S. military, in close coordination with Nigerian forces, conducted a series of strikes in mid-May that reportedly killed scores of Islamic State (ISIS) fighters. These operations underscore the Trump administration’s intensified focus on combating militant groups across the African continent.
The joint campaign commenced on May 16 with a coordinated operation that resulted in the death of Abu-Bilal al-Minuki, identified by U.S. officials as ISIS’s second-in-command for global operations, along with several other high-ranking members of the militant group. This initial strike, targeting northeast Nigeria, was followed by what U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) described as “additional kinetic strikes” on May 17 and May 18.
The impact of these operations was detailed by senior military officials. General Dagvin R. M. Anderson, head of U.S. Africa Command, testified before the House Armed Services Committee on May 19, stating that the actions constituted “significant strikes that set back the ISIS network significantly globally.” General Anderson characterized al-Minuki as “the most active and impactful terrorist in the world” prior to his death in a U.S. airstrike during the May 16 operation. A Nigerian military spokesperson corroborated the scale of the operations, announcing on May 19 that approximately 175 ISIS fighters had been killed in the recent engagements.
These concentrated efforts in Africa are occurring concurrently with other significant U.S. military engagements. U.S. air and naval forces are reportedly imposing a blockade on Iran and preparing for a potential renewal of military operations against Tehran. Diplomatic efforts to open the Strait of Hormuz and impose new constraints on Iran’s nuclear program remain at an impasse, indicating a complex and multi-front strategic environment for U.S. forces globally.
AFRICOM released a statement following the Nigeria operations, affirming its commitment to supporting partners in defeating shared security threats. “AFRICOM remains committed to leveraging specialized U.S. capabilities in support of our partners to defeat shared security threats,” the command stated, adding that “complete assessments are ongoing” for the recent operations. Videos released by AFRICOM appear to show U.S. airstrikes, which American officials confirmed were executed in coordination with the Nigerian government.
The recent focus on Africa reflects a broader shift in the operational landscape of the Islamic State. While the group’s self-declared caliphate in Iraq and Syria collapsed in 2019, and the U.S. has since transferred bases in Syria to the Syrian government and moved approximately 5,700 ISIS fighters from Syrian prison camps to Iraq (as reported by U.S. Central Command head Adm. Brad Cooper), ISIS has demonstrated resilience and a growing presence through its African affiliates. General Anderson articulated this evolving threat, stating, “Today, the epicenter of global terrorism is in Africa. ISIS leadership is African. Al Qaida’s economic engine is in Africa. Both groups share the will and intent to strike our homeland.” This assessment suggests a strategic pivot by global terrorist organizations towards the African continent, making it a critical area for international counterterrorism efforts.
The campaign against militants in Nigeria is a relatively recent development in the U.S.’s broader African counterterrorism strategy. Long-running strikes against ISIS in Somalia and al-Shabab, an al-Qaeda affiliate, have been ongoing and intensified throughout 2025 and 2026. U.S. involvement in Nigeria escalated following Tomahawk missile strikes on Christmas Day 2025, which President Trump indicated were in response to attacks on Christians in the country. Since then, cooperation between the U.S. and Nigeria has reportedly deepened significantly.
General Anderson praised the bilateral relationship, telling lawmakers, “We have had an incredibly good partnership and cooperation with the Nigerians, including their intelligence sharing. We are working with them as they address the strategy to address the greater drivers of this terrorism.” This highlights the importance of intelligence exchange and collaborative strategy development in confronting complex militant threats.
The Nigerian military has indicated that these joint operations will continue. A spokesperson stated, “The joint strikes have resulted in the destruction of ISIS checkpoints, weapons caches, logistical hubs, military equipment, and financial networks used to sustain terrorist operations. The joint operations will continue to hunt down and destroy those who threaten our nation and regional stability.”
Despite these successes, U.S. counterterrorism efforts in Africa have faced significant challenges. A notable setback occurred in 2024 when U.S. military forces were compelled to withdraw from Niger following a military coup. This withdrawal included the loss of access to a crucial base for U.S. drone operations in the Sahel region, a strategically vital area for monitoring and responding to militant activities.
General Anderson acknowledged the impact of these constraints, noting that the inability to operate freely in Niger has hampered counterterrorism efforts. He also cited the limited overall U.S. military presence on the continent. Beyond a primary base in Djibouti in East Africa, the U.S. lacks substantial installations to stage extensive operations across the vast continent. Compounding this, key U.S. partners like France have also reduced their military footprints in Africa in recent years.
General Anderson expressed concerns about the implications of this reduced presence. “[With] a 75 percent reduction in our regional posture over the past decade, compounded by the drawdown of our allies, we struggle with an intelligence black hole,” he stated. “Without sufficient indicators and warnings, we risk being blind to the gathering dangers and threats of the region.” He further warned, “AFRICOM’s lack of expeditionary capabilities and diminished force posture compromises our crisis response. In a crisis, we can surge assets, but you cannot surge trust. Our reduced presence on the continent also allows disruptive actors to drive the agenda and undercut American interests.”
The Trump administration has emphasized a shift towards a more transactional relationship with African nations, a policy articulated by Undersecretary of Defense for International Security Daniel Zimmerman during the May 19 hearing. Zimmerman indicated the U.S. was pursuing a “trade and investment-focused relationship” with countries in the region, suggesting a broader re-evaluation of engagement priorities.
Nevertheless, General Anderson underscored that despite its limited presence, the U.S. military maintains unique capabilities that are critical to partners. “AFRICOM is prioritizing willing and capable partners,” Anderson affirmed. “We support partners with unique capabilities that only the U.S. can provide, such as ISR [Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance], targeting, and precision strike. This approach has taken ISIS leaders off the battlefield in Nigeria and driven their leadership in Somalia underground, putting pressure on the broader ISIS network in West Africa.”
Why This Matters
The recent joint U.S.-Nigerian military operations against ISIS highlight several critical issues in global security and foreign policy. Firstly, they underscore the evolving nature and geographic shift of the global terrorist threat. With the Islamic State’s core caliphate dismantled in the Middle East, its affiliates in Africa have grown in prominence and capability, turning the continent into what U.S. officials now describe as the “epicenter of global terrorism.” This shift necessitates a re-evaluation of international counterterrorism strategies and resource allocation.
Secondly, these events demonstrate the vital role of international partnerships in addressing complex security challenges. The success of the operations in Nigeria, particularly the killing of a senior global ISIS leader, is attributed to close coordination and intelligence sharing between the U.S. and Nigerian forces. This model of collaboration is crucial, especially as the U.S. military grapples with a reduced footprint and resource constraints in the region.
Thirdly, the article reveals the strategic dilemmas faced by the U.S. in Africa. The withdrawal from Niger and the overall reduction in U.S. military presence raise concerns about intelligence gaps and the ability to respond effectively to crises. These constraints come at a time when the U.S. military is also managing other significant global commitments, such as the ongoing tensions with Iran. The challenge lies in balancing global priorities with the imperative to prevent the further entrenchment of militant groups in Africa, which could eventually pose direct threats to American interests and homelands.
Finally, the Trump administration’s emphasis on a “transactional” and “trade and investment-focused relationship” with African nations signals a potential shift in U.S. engagement strategy. How this approach will reconcile with the growing security threats and the need for robust military partnerships remains a key question for regional stability and U.S. foreign policy objectives in the coming years.
Audio of this article is brought to you by the Air & Space Forces Association, honoring and supporting our Airmen, Guardians, and their families. Find out more at afa.org