Access the Editor’s Summary without charge
Roula Khalaf, the FT’s Editor, hand-picks her most liked articles for this weekly publication.
Affluent individuals who poured vast sums, hundreds of billions of dollars, into private lending are now retreating, thereby severing a crucial wellspring of capital that major investment firms such as Blackstone, Blue Owl, and Ares Management have relied on to power their expansion.
Fresh pledges to what are termed non-listed business development companies — these rapidly expanding funds aimed at individual consumers and affluent persons — decreased by 40 per cent, reaching $3.2bn in January when contrasted with December’s figures, as reported by the investment bank RA Stanger.
This decline in capital raising will probably present a significant challenge for an sector involved in loans that seldom, if ever, change hands, and executives have informed the FT of their conviction that money departing could shortly start to exceed the amount entering some of the most substantial funds.
This would signify a notable alteration for these funds, which customarily permit investors to withdraw 5 per cent of a vehicle’s net holdings every three months. During the fourth quarter, funds primarily managed to fulfill requests for withdrawals by using fresh commitments from other wealth management patrons, thereby reducing their necessity to tap into alternative cash reserves to compensate departing investors.
Blue Owl’s choice this month to indefinitely suspend redemptions from one of its non-listed funds is anticipated to curb individual investor interest, as financial consultants report difficulty in advocating for this asset category to hesitant customers.
Devaluations across multiple funds, including publicly listed instruments overseen by KKR, Apollo Global Management, and BlackRock, have intensified examination of an asset category experiencing diminishing investor enthusiasm, particularly as the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates and loan defaults started to gradually increase.
This “will genuinely immobilize the individual investor segment,” stated the chief of a private lending company. “I believe investment thresholds will become exceptionally stringent. This will create an obstacle for the individual investor segment — affecting not only Blue Owl but all participants.”
Patrick Dwyer, a financial consultant at NewEdge Wealth in Miami, mentioned that he had been responding to client inquiries throughout the week regarding the wider sector, following Blue Owl’s suspension of withdrawals from one private lending fund.
Although he believed investors ought to retain private lending, he cautioned that it was unsuitable for all: “Private lending represents an illiquid asset category, and it is fitting exclusively for investors capable of truly enduring such lack of liquidity.”
Leaders throughout the financial advisory sector observe resemblances to their situation in 2022, a period when Blackstone’s Breit real estate fund restricted payouts subsequent to substantial redemption requests.
The fund, which eventually successfully managed the market turbulence and recorded robust profits last year, began to epitomize the strain a semi-liquid fund might encounter when individual investors hurried to withdraw.
Transactions involving comparable real estate funds decelerated as investors anticipated a change in the property sector, with some voicing annoyance at the restrictions and others proceeding to liquidate as they observed an increasing line for departure.
A portfolio specialist at a significant asset management firm posed the question: “Is this on the verge of doing to non-listed BDCs [business development companies] what Breit did to non-listed Reits, where all the commotion and reports lead individuals to declare ‘I wouldn’t go near this’?”
Market participants have been diligently tracking monthly reports for signs of buyer interest as they anticipate the outcomes of quarterly withdrawals in the coming weeks.
An FT examination revealed that sales had slowed down for the majority of funds in January and February. These statistics offer an incomplete insight into activity, given they exclude re-invested dividends, which direct billions of dollars into these instruments annually.
Blackstone’s leading $82.5bn fund, identified as Bcred, disclosed approximately $1.1bn in sales during the initial two months of 2026. Conversely, the fund attracted over $1bn monthly on average throughout the previous year.
Analysts are evaluating these outcomes when compared to the $2.1bn in withdrawals Bcred declared for the fourth quarter.
Apollo’s $25.1bn fund, Apollo Debt Solutions, revealed roughly $150mn in sales for February, representing a 72 per cent decrease from its typical monthly rate last year. Sales have additionally moderated at private lending funds overseen by BlackRock’s HPS Investment Partners, Ares, and Blue Owl.
Managers stated they possessed plentiful reservoirs of fluid assets should withdrawals persist at heightened levels, indicating bank lines of credit and collections of marketable loans they could divest to generate capital. Funds administered by Blue Owl and the investment company New Mountain Capital each offloaded loan portfolios this month to strengthen their fiscal standing.
The companies refused to make a statement.