Lorde Disses AI Glasses: Why She Calls Them a Fashion Faux Pas

While Kylie Jenner serves as a human billboard for Meta’s AI glasses, pop star Lorde isn’t buying it.

During a set at the Mad Cool Festival in Madrid last week, Lorde had some choice words about the new technology, which many security experts have deemed a privacy nightmare.

Key Takeaways:

• Celebrity Dissent vs. Endorsement:Pop star Lorde publicly condemned Meta AI glasses as “not sexy” and a privacy threat, directly contrasting the high-profile endorsements from figures like Kylie Jenner and Jennie, highlighting a growing cultural divide.
• Privacy Under Scrutiny:Despite Meta’s implementation of safeguards like a visible recording light and robust sales, smart glasses continue to face intense criticism from privacy advocates, security experts, and legal challenges alleging misuse and data exploitation.
• The Unfolding Tech-Culture Clash:The rapid adoption of AI-powered wearable tech, evidenced by 7 million units sold in 2025, is fueling a broader societal debate about authenticity, constant surveillance, and the blurred lines between reality and digitally mediated experience.

In a world increasingly saturated with smart devices vying for our attention and data, a powerful voice has emerged from an unexpected corner: the stage of the Mad Cool Festival in Madrid. New Zealand pop sensation Lorde, known for her introspective lyrics and candid commentary, took a bold stance against Meta’s AI-powered smart glasses, delivering a scathing critique that resonated far beyond the festival grounds. Her impassioned declaration, aimed squarely at the wearable tech revolution, has reignited critical conversations about privacy, authenticity, and the very fabric of our digital existence.

“Increasingly in our world, it gets harder and harder to know what is real,” Lorde told the audience, her words cutting through the festival buzz. “You don’t know if someone is wearing sunglasses, or if they’re wearing those f—ed up, f—ing [AI glasses]. Can I just say, for the record, f— the glasses. Don’t get the glasses. Not sexy.” This wasn’t merely a throwaway comment; it was a potent rejection of a technology she believes blurs the lines of reality and invades personal space. For an artist who once famously threw her phone into the ocean as an act of digital rebellion, this latest broadside against AI glasses marks an escalation in her vocal opposition to pervasive tech.

The irony of the moment wasn’t lost on observers. Ray-Ban, a key partner with Meta in manufacturing these very AI glasses, was a prominent sponsor of the Mad Cool Festival. Furthermore, Lorde’s set immediately preceded that of Jennie, the acclaimed singer and ambassador for Ray-Ban Meta’s smart glasses line. This juxtaposition amplified Lorde’s dissenting voice, turning her performance into a powerful counter-narrative against the tide of celebrity endorsements and corporate sponsorships, presenting a clear fork in the road for public perception.

Lorde’s concerns are not isolated. Smart glasses, equipped with integrated cameras and AI capabilities, have consistently drawn fire from privacy advocates and security experts. The potential for these devices to surreptitiously record, capture, and transmit personal data without explicit consent is a significant ethical quandary. Instances of smart glasses being leveraged for harassment, non-consensual recording, and even extortion have already surfaced, painting a grim picture of their darker applications and raising fundamental questions about the right to be unobserved in public spaces.

Meta, the dominant player in the smart glasses market, asserts that it prioritizes user privacy. The company highlights safeguards such as a visible recording light designed to alert those nearby that the device is actively capturing content. However, critics argue that these measures are often insufficient or easily circumvented, and the fundamental nature of a camera-equipped wearable device raises inherent privacy issues that can’t be easily mitigated. Meta is currently embroiled in multiple investigations and lawsuits regarding alleged privacy violations, including a particularly disturbing claim alleging that Kenyan contract workers were compelled to review graphic videos, some potentially obtained via smart glasses, to train Meta’s AI systems. While Meta has not publicly detailed its response to this specific claim, it underscores the profound ethical complexities surrounding AI development, data collection, and the global supply chain that supports these technologies.

Despite the swirling controversies and ethical red flags, the commercial trajectory of Meta AI glasses tells a different story. EssilorLuxottica, the parent company behind Ray-Ban, reported staggering sales figures: over 7 million Meta AI glasses sold in 2025 alone. This represents a remarkable threefold increase over the combined sales of roughly 2 million units in 2023 and 2024. Such robust demand has emboldened Meta, leading to a continuous expansion of their smart glasses lineup and solidifying their position as a leading force in the nascent wearable AI market. The appeal seems to stem from a blend of convenience, cutting-edge technology, and the allure of a seamless digital integration into daily life, making them a hit among early adopters and tech enthusiasts eager to experience the future today.

Yet, amidst this commercial triumph, Lorde’s blunt assessment cuts through the noise. If the gravitas of privacy concerns and ethical debates isn’t enough to make people pause, perhaps her simple, yet powerful, declaration will resonate: they’re simply “not sexy.” In an age where personal branding and curated aesthetics dominate social interaction, the idea of a clunky, potentially intrusive recording device might just be the Achilles’ heel for mainstream adoption. Lorde’s emphasis on the “here and now” being “sexy” isn’t just about appearance; it’s a profound call for authentic presence and genuine human connection, untainted by the constant mediation and potential surveillance of technology, advocating for a return to unadulterated reality.

Bottom Line:

Lorde’s public condemnation of Meta AI glasses underscores a critical cultural pushback against pervasive surveillance tech, even as sales surge. While Meta navigates mounting privacy lawsuits and attempts to reassure users, the debate is increasingly shifting from purely technical safeguards to broader societal implications concerning authenticity, consent, and the very definition of human interaction in an AI-driven world. The commercial success of smart glasses is undeniable, yet the growing chorus of dissenting voices, led by influential figures like Lorde, signals a deeper, more nuanced struggle for control over our digital and personal realities, suggesting that the “cool factor” alone may not overcome fundamental ethical concerns in the long run.