Gain access to the White House Watch newsletter without charge
An essential overview of the implications of Trump’s subsequent tenure for the capital, commerce, and the global stage
Scott Bessent addressed strengthening the US Treasury’s supervision of the Federal Reserve by integrating components from the Bank of England’s model, a move poised to significantly alter the central bank’s ties to the administration.
The Treasury secretary conveyed to financial market players his high regard for the structural changes implemented by the British government in 1997, when the BoE received full autonomy to dictate monetary policy operations, as reported by executives within the financial sector apprised of the situation.
Even though both primary banks uphold official autonomy from their corresponding administrations, the Fed enjoys broader discretion in how it aims for its Congressionally stipulated goals of maintaining stable prices and achieving peak employment, and its operational conduct during episodes of financial turbulence.
Discussions initiated by Bessent concerning the re-evaluation of this connection emerge amidst an era where President Donald Trump has unleashed an unparalleled critique against the planet’s paramount central bank, labeling Fed chair Jay Powell a “fool” for his reluctance to lower lending rates.
Furthermore, Trump’s department of justice has initiated a criminal investigation into Powell regarding modifications to the Fed’s main office, an action that has caused apprehension among investors and international central banking officials.
These dialogues concerning the Fed’s interaction with the Treasury are expected to spark close examination among investors regarding the Trump administration’s perspective on the central bank’s integral function within the US economic framework.
Responding to inquiries from the FT regarding the Fed’s rapport with the Treasury, Bessent stated: “The US Federal Reserve’s directive to foster peak employment, stable pricing, and reasonable long-term interest rates holds immense significance for the worldwide financial architecture.”
He has publicly contended that the Fed requires reform, even as it preserves its autonomy in monetary policy, and in the previous year, he critiqued its extensive bond-acquisition initiatives, termed quantitative easing, describing them as a “gain-of-function monetary policy experiment” within a substantial article published in The International Economy magazine.
He has additionally commended the BoE’s more measured approach to the 2022 gilt market turmoil, drawing a contrast with the Fed’s prolonged quantitative easing, which he pinpointed as the cause for the period of significantly heightened US inflation in the years subsequent to the coronavirus outbreak.
“In the UK, it is commendable how the Bank of England executes extensive asset acquisitions during financial downturns and other periods of widespread strain, and how it ceases its involvement once orderly market operations have resumed,” Bessent informed the FT.
Certain market players who conversed with Bessent believed the Treasury secretary might endorse the British framework where the BoE governor communicates consistently with the chancellor regarding the central bank’s inflation objective. Furthermore, the BoE dispatches correspondence to the UK Treasury if it fails to meet its inflation target.
Bessent conveyed to the FT that “the practice of routine written communication between the chancellor and governor” had “demonstrated itself to be both inefficient and overly formal”.
Kevin Warsh, Trump’s chosen successor for Powell upon the conclusion of his term as chair in May, has indicated a potential interest in implementing the BoE’s epistolary procedure during periods of upheaval. In 2014, Warsh oversaw an assessment of the BoE’s monetary policy activities.
“The dispatches exchanged between the Chancellor and the head of the Bank of England are clear; they detail occurrences and provide the reasoning behind them,” Warsh affirmed in his 2023 testimony to the House of Lords concerning central bank autonomy, simultaneously lauding the BoE’s application of quantitative easing as “superior to that in the United States”.
Warsh, a frequent critic of the Fed for venturing into what he perceives as the purview of fiscal policy, regards BoE-style correspondence during crises as a method to refine and solidify modifications that both he and Bessent have openly expressed a desire to implement in the nexus between the Treasury and the Fed, according to individuals acquainted with his perspective.
The Federal Reserve and Warsh chose not to offer a statement.
The erstwhile Fed governor, whose confirmation as chair by the US Senate is still pending, has been acquainted with Bessent for many years. Even prior to the nomination, the pair had conversed about approaches the administration could take to delineate the central bank’s duties, as per sources familiar with the situation.
The connection between the Treasury and the American central bank is outlined by the Treasury-Fed Accord of 1951 — an instrument frequently regarded as the fundamental principle underpinning rate-setters’ freedom to establish monetary policy unhindered by intrusion from the nation’s political authorities, including the head of state.
The bond between the Treasury secretary and the Fed head is presently informal, usually involving a weekly breakfast meeting between the two.
When Tony Blair’s Labour administration bestowed autonomy upon the BoE in 1997, it did so with specific conditions that permit the UK government to retain a degree of influence over the central bank’s directive.
The UK Treasury possesses the official authority to establish the BoE’s inflation objective at 2 percent. Conversely, the Fed is charged by Congress with ensuring price stability, yet the monetary policymakers opted for a 2 percent inflation target during the tenure of former Fed chair Ben Bernanke.
The Fed furnishes reports to Congress — which exercises official supervision over the US central bank — concerning its monetary policy determinations semiannually.
Further contributions by Kate Duguid in New York