Gain access to the Editor’s Collection for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, curates her preferred articles in this weekly bulletin.
BP’s incoming chief has pledged “unambiguous guidance and steadiness” following a year during which the British petroleum giant altered its approach under influence from an activist investor, and saw the departure of both its chairman and chief executive.
Meg O’Neill, the 55-year-old US oil executive tasked with revitalizing BP, conveyed in her initial address to employees that she acknowledged the company had experienced “considerable transformation, which can be challenging”.
Her appointment comes after a turbulent phase in which BP tempered its green energy aspirations due to pressure from campaigning shareholder Elliott Management, and separated from its chair Helge Lund and previous chief executive Murray Auchincloss.
O’Neill indicated an ongoing commitment to recent endeavors aimed at enhancing results, but stated her desire to accelerate progress. She added that while advancement had occurred in achieving immediate goals to 2027, “further tasks remain”.
“I’m dedicated to offering definite leadership and stability so we can advance collectively with assurance,” she informed staff.
O’Neill commences her tenure as BP’s first female chief executive and the initial external candidate directly chosen for the position, marking a departure from the firm’s usual practice of promoting from within. Prior to her commencement, BP became the first prominent energy company to halt its stock repurchase scheme in February as it contends with reducing its approximately $22bn accumulated debt.
Albert Manifold, who assumed the chairmanship of BP last year and has urged the company to advance more aggressively and swiftly in maximizing investor returns, characterized O’Neill in BP’s annual report in March as “the fitting head” to exploit “considerable tactical and monetary avenues”.
Influenced by Elliott, which disclosed a 5% holding in BP last year, BP has started offloading holdings and this year reduced the valuation of its solar, offshore wind and biogas businesses by over $4bn. O’Neill informed employees of her desire to render the company “less complex, more robust and of greater worth”.
The steep increase in petroleum costs due to the conflict in Iran has provided a measure of comfort. When BP publicized her designation, the oil price was below $60 a barrel. On Tuesday, standard Brent crude had approximately doubled to just under $119 against the backdrop of the US and Israeli engagement in Iran. BP’s share price has increased commensurately, up 44 per cent to 605p in the same period.
Experts at HSBC calculate that approximately 10% of BP’s petroleum and liquefied natural gas production has been impacted by the hostilities, but noted that higher prices more than counterbalanced the interruption. The bank has boosted its projected 2026 earnings per share forecast by 63 per cent and its cash generation per share projection by 18 per cent.
In her communication, O’Neill said BP was traversing a climate of “considerable intricacy”, referencing “international political strain, strife, swift technological evolution and fluctuating worldwide energy requirements”. She added: “Our role is indispensable in furnishing consumers globally with essential energy to facilitate their prosperity.”