Bianco Research President Jim Bianco weighs in on AI resulting in groupthink investing and SpaceX hitting the market on Making Money.
### Key Takeaways
1. **Human Trust Endures Amidst AI Hype:** Despite the burgeoning interest and massive market investment in artificial intelligence, investors overwhelmingly prioritize human financial advisors for critical, high-stakes financial decisions, underscoring the enduring value of trust and empathy in wealth management.
2. **AI as a Tactical Discovery Tool:** Artificial intelligence is emerging as a valuable preliminary resource for “tactical” financial queries (e.g., 401(k) basics, 529 plans), serving as a powerful discovery engine that can inform and refine questions before engaging a human expert.
3. **Evolving Advisory Landscape:** The financial advisory sector is adapting to a hybrid model where AI augments human capabilities, enhancing efficiency and data analysis for advisors, rather than outright replacing the nuanced, relationship-driven core of holistic wealth management.
Amidst a backdrop of unprecedented technological advancement and market volatility, investors are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence (AI) tools for guidance on their finances and investments. Yet, a striking paradox emerges: while curiosity about AI’s capabilities is high, deep-seated skepticism about its output persists, compelling individuals to continue leaning heavily on human advice ahead of pivotal financial decisions. This dynamic, highlighted by new data, illustrates a nuanced market reality where innovation is embraced for its informational power, but human judgment remains paramount for consequential choices.
A recent study by Gallup, conducted in partnership with wealth management giant Edward Jones, shines a light on contemporary investor behavior. The research reveals that approximately three-quarters of Americans have actively sought financial guidance from at least one source over the past year. This widespread quest for financial clarity underscores a period of economic uncertainty, with persistent inflation, fluctuating interest rates, and evolving market dynamics prompting individuals to actively manage their financial futures.
Among those U.S. adults who have sought guidance, the channels are diverse, reflecting the fragmented information landscape of the digital age. A dominant 73% utilized their own internet research, a testament to the democratization of financial information. This is followed by more traditional, human-centric sources: 35% consulted family members, 32% engaged professional financial advisors, 26% turned to news or social media, and 23% discussed finances with friends. Notably, 18% sought financial guidance from cutting-edge AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude, among others, signaling a nascent but growing adoption of these technologies in personal finance.
Americans have broad confidence in financial advisors, with about one-in-four saying they have a great deal of confidence in them, Gallup found.(istock)
The market’s confidence in these various guidance sources, however, tells a compelling story. While AI is celebrated for its disruptive potential across industries, its credibility in personal finance advice is still developing. A substantial 79% of American adults expressed at least some confidence in financial advisors, with a significant one-quarter reporting a “great deal” of confidence. This contrasts sharply with AI’s standing; less than three in 10 respondents expressed even “some confidence” in AI for financial guidance, and a mere 3% harbored a “great deal” of confidence. This gap in trust highlights a critical differentiator in the competitive landscape of financial advice.
AMERICANS’ 401(K) BALANCES HIT RECORD LEVELS IN 2025
David Chubak, head of wealth management at Edward Jones, articulated this sentiment to FOX Business, stating that the research “reaffirms to us that when it comes to the conversation of consequence, to making a real-life decision, people aren’t ready to trust AI as the decision maker for them, as the counselor.” In a market often driven by sentiment and complex, highly personalized situations, the algorithmic output of AI often falls short of the nuanced understanding required for crucial financial planning.
Chubak emphasized the enduring human element: “Rather, they are still relying on their financial advisor as their trusted human partner to help them think through the process, the experience of that decision.” This perspective resonates deeply within the wealth management industry, where the value proposition of human advisors extends beyond mere data analysis to encompass empathy, behavioral coaching, and holistic life planning. “AI, as we see it, plays an important role in some of the discovery and approach to people improving their finances. When it comes to improving their financial fulfillment, people still believe inherently in the importance of a human, trust relationship,” he added.
WHAT ARE THE INVESTMENT OPTIONS FOR TRUMP ACCOUNTS?

The study found that about 18% of American adults have used AI tools for financial guidance.(iStock/Getty Images Plus)
The strategic role of AI, according to Chubak, lies in addressing what he terms “tactical” questions. These typically involve straightforward information retrieval or comparative analysis, such as understanding the mechanics of 401(k) retirement plans, exploring the benefits of 529 education savings accounts, or inquiring about newly launched investment vehicles like “Trump Accounts.” In these scenarios, AI excels at processing vast amounts of information quickly, providing factual summaries, and outlining basic options—tasks that can be time-consuming for human advisors and for which investors are often seeking quick answers. This aligns with the “groupthink investing” concern raised by Jim Bianco, where AI’s efficiency in delivering popular or easily accessible information might inadvertently lead to a herd mentality if not balanced with critical human judgment.
However, the boundaries of AI’s utility become apparent when considering deeper, more personal financial planning. Chubak noted that individuals are generally not spending as much time with AI tools when it comes to addressing the fundamental purpose of their personal financial planning, navigating complex life transitions, or grappling with the inherent anxieties tied to long-term financial security. These are areas where the subjective, emotional, and psychological dimensions of money management come to the fore—a realm where AI, despite its analytical prowess, currently lacks the capacity for empathy, intuition, and bespoke guidance.
MOST 401(K) SAVERS MAY BE SHORT-CHANGING THEMSELVES, DATA SHOWS

Chubak said that AI can help an individual refine their financial questions or concerns, which can be addressed with a human advisor.(iStock)
“There, they’re going to the advisor to have that conversation, to unroot what the real question is that they’re trying to solve and then try to solve it with them,” Chubak said. This perspective highlights the complementary nature of AI and human advice. AI can act as an initial filter or a sophisticated research assistant, empowering investors to arrive at an advisor’s office with more refined questions and a better foundational understanding.
He added that the more tactical or discovery-oriented interactions with AI tools can “really help them identify when they need an advisor,” as well as to help them “sharpen where the focus areas that they want to go are, so that the advisor can really hone in on the most impactful opportunities.” In essence, AI streamlines the preliminary research, allowing human advisors to dedicate their expertise to higher-value activities: understanding complex client needs, offering tailored strategies, and providing the emotional support crucial during significant financial decisions.
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
Market Impact
The findings have significant implications across the financial services landscape. For financial advisory firms, it reinforces the enduring competitive advantage of human-centric advice, even as they must strategically integrate AI to enhance efficiency and client engagement. Firms that successfully blend AI for data analysis and tactical information with highly personalized human guidance will likely capture a greater market share. Technology companies developing AI solutions for finance will need to focus not just on computational power but also on building trust and addressing ethical considerations, perhaps by positioning AI as an augmentative tool rather than a replacement. For investors, the message is clear: while AI offers an accessible gateway to financial information, it’s a tool best used for discovery, with critical decisions still warranting the seasoned judgment and empathetic understanding of a human advisor. This hybrid approach suggests a future where AI and human expertise collaborate, driving both efficiency and deeper client relationships in an increasingly complex financial world.

