Access the Editor’s Summary for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, curates her preferred articles in this periodic bulletin.
Sir Keir Starmer has declared Britain ought to “speed up” efforts in boosting military expenditure, as he weighs hastening the schedule for dedicating 3 per cent of UK GDP to defence and contends with methods to finance an enhancement.
The prime minister voiced his views after returning from the three-day Munich Security Conference, during which he articulated his aspiration for the UK to unite with its partners in a collaborative security undertaking to fund and supervise collective military rebuilding.
Individuals acquainted with the situation said Starmer was evaluating an option to advance proposals to allocate 3 per cent of GDP to security, after the BBC reported that he might establish the cutoff point for the end of this parliament, but emphasized it was improbable to materialize.
The prime minister has previously declared a “goal” to devote 3 per cent of GDP to national security during the forthcoming legislative session, which is projected to extend from 2029 until approximately 2034.
Britain and its Nato allies have also pledged to a distinct 5 per cent of GDP expenditure goal by 2035, of which 3.5 per cent of GDP is earmarked for “essential” defense — military personnel and armaments — and an additional 1.5 per cent of GDP goes towards security-linked infrastructure and protection.
The prime minister did not refute the accounts when questioned on Monday and said Europe needs to “intensify efforts when it comes to defence and security”.
He further stated: “We have a menace of Russian aggression. Within days, it will mark the four-year anniversary of the commencement of hostilities in Ukraine.
“We want an equitable and enduring tranquility, but that will not eliminate the Russian menace, and we must remain vigilant of that, because that’s going to impact every single person in this room, every single person in this country, so we need to step up.
“That means concerning military expenditure, we must accelerate our pace.”
UK defence spending is projected to increase to 2.5 per cent of GDP from 2027, an increase from approximately 2.3 per cent when the Labour party assumed office in 2024.
In January, Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton, head of the armed forces, informed parliamentarians that absent further financial resources, the military would be incapable of implementing the suggestions of the administration’s principal strategic security assessment, whose conclusions were presented last year, without curtailing current initiatives.
The government has not yet unveiled its postponed security funding strategy, which is intended to detail armed forces expenditure proposals for the coming ten years.
Starmer is still to clarify the financing mechanism for any increase in security expenditure. Authorities have deliberated on a broad array of alternatives, spanning from initiating fresh collaborations between public and private sectors to relaxing budgetary regulations to incur further debt.
The prime minister’s official spokesperson opted not to address on Monday regarding “conjecture” about advancing the proposal to allocate 3 per cent of GDP to the end of this parliament, but underscored Starmer’s involvement on Saturday in Munich.
“We have shown our shared objective concerning this matter, as well, with the momentous accord to elevate expenditure to 5 per cent for protection and military,” the spokesperson said.
Tan Dhesi, Labour head of the parliamentary defence committee, urged Starmer to pledge adherence to the sooner objective.
“Given the escalated dangers and volatile circumstances we encounter across our continent, it is crucial that we devise a strategy to substantially augment funding for military and protection. We must not postpone the decision into the subsequent legislative term,” he said.
The Conservatives remarked on Starmer’s “assertive rhetoric” regarding the necessity for greater defense outlays was diametrically opposed to his absence of “tangible measures”.
Tory opposition defense minister James Cartlidge said “Until Starmer releases the considerably delayed military funding strategy and demonstrates an ability to resist his progressive caucus members, discussions of 3 per cent defense allocation remains merely an unrealistic aspiration.”