The $1 Billion Question: Why Global Buyout Funds Are Exiting China Data Centers

Stay informed with free updates

Simply sign up to the Chinese business & finance myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.

Foreign private equity firms are cashing out of China’s data centre sector after years of betting billions on the country’s cloud computing boom, as political and regulatory pressures make overseas ownership of digital infrastructure increasingly difficult. This strategic pivot marks a significant recalibration in global investment strategies, reflecting a growing prioritization of regulatory stability and geopolitical alignment over sheer market size in critical infrastructure sectors.

Princeton Digital Group (PDG), which is backed by Warburg Pincus, is launching a sale of its China assets that could fetch as much as $1bn, according to three people familiar with the process. This move adds to a string of high-profile exits by global funds, including Bain Capital and Carlyle, underscoring a broader, industry-wide trend rather than isolated incidents.

A successful sale of PDG, which owns data centres across six Chinese cities, would effectively mark the near end of a decade-long push by global buyout firms to invest directly into China’s burgeoning digital infrastructure. From approximately 2017, buyout groups including Bain, Warburg Pincus, and Carlyle poured billions into the Chinese data centre sector, drawn by booming demand from hyper-scale cloud providers owned by domestic tech giants like Alibaba, Tencent, and ByteDance. These assets promised the kind of steady, infrastructure-like returns prized by private equity investors, buoyed by the prospect of China’s immense and rapidly digitizing economy.

However, the investment landscape has fundamentally shifted. Even as China’s cloud market continues its impressive expansion, Beijing’s increasingly tightening cyber security and data protection regime has made foreign ownership of critical digital infrastructure politically fraught. Key legislative frameworks, such as the Cybersecurity Law, Data Security Law, and Personal Information Protection Law, have introduced stringent requirements around data localization, cross-border data transfer, and state-mandated security reviews for critical information infrastructure. This creates an unpredictable operating environment for foreign entities, raising concerns about data sovereignty, operational autonomy, and potential national security implications in an era of heightened geopolitical tension.

Compounding these “push” factors, rising AI-driven demand for computing power has meanwhile lifted valuations across the data centre sector globally. This surge in demand, fueled by the rapid development and deployment of generative AI technologies, presents international investors with an opportune window to sell their Chinese assets to domestic buyers at attractive prices. This allows them to de-risk their portfolios and redeploy capital into politically safer and transparent markets elsewhere in Asia, where they also foresee significant, long-term growth trajectories.

That strategic shift has already produced some of the industry’s biggest recent deals, setting a precedent for subsequent exits. Last year, Bain Capital sold its Chinese data centre assets to a local consortium led by Shenzhen Dongyangguang Industry for a reported $4bn. Crucially, Bain simultaneously retained the non-China operations of Bridge Data Centers, the regional platform it had meticulously built through a series of acquisitions. This move clearly illustrates a bifurcated strategy: monetize Chinese assets while continuing to invest aggressively in other parts of Asia.

Based on valuation multiples from Bain’s earlier China data centre sale, PDG’s assets could realistically fetch up to $1bn, according to people familiar with the process. Such a transaction would reinforce the market’s assessment of Chinese data centre valuations and the strong appetite from domestic players to consolidate national digital infrastructure.

Carlyle, another prominent global fund, invested in VNET Group, a Chinese digital infrastructure company, through convertible bonds in 2020. The Washington-based fund has steadily reduced its exposure over the past two years, first through refinancing backed by Chinese state capital, and eventually culminating in a complete buyout by Chinese battery maker CATL. This phased exit strategy highlights how global investors are meticulously managing their unwinding from Chinese digital assets, often involving collaboration with domestic entities.

As global private equity firms orchestrate this wave of exits from mainland China’s data centre businesses, they are simultaneously redirecting tens of billions of dollars into the rest of Asia, betting on diverse and rapidly expanding digital economies. This reallocation of capital is not merely a divestment but a strategic re-weighting of their portfolios towards regions offering a more predictable regulatory environment and robust demand drivers.

Malaysia — particularly Johor, located strategically near Singapore — has emerged as one of the fastest-growing data centre hubs in the region. Private equity firms are rushing to build greenfield infrastructure aimed at servicing clients not only in Singapore, a major connectivity hub, but also potentially leveraging its proximity for certain Chinese workloads, while benefiting from lower operating costs and government incentives.

Japan has also become a key market for regional expansion due to its robust regulatory stability, advanced infrastructure, and a relatively weak yen which makes foreign investments more attractive. Blackstone, for instance, led a consortium to acquire Sydney-based AirTrunk for $15bn and is now leveraging this platform to expand aggressively in Tokyo and Osaka, supporting the burgeoning cloud operations of global hyperscalers like Microsoft and Google.

India, with its vast population, rapidly digitizing economy, and government-backed initiatives like “Digital India,” has also emerged as a prime target for private equity firms seeking long-term, scalable growth. After selling its Chinese data centres, Bain Capital explicitly redirected capital into Bridge Data Centers, its non-China platform, specifically to bankroll greenfield developments across the Indian subcontinent, anticipating explosive demand for data storage and processing in the coming decade.

Warburg Pincus and PDG did not respond to requests for comment.