Gain access to the Editor’s Summary without cost
Roula Khalaf, the FT’s Editor, meticulously chooses her preferred articles for this weekly bulletin.
Rachel Reeves’ proposals for buttressing the UK’s state finances and reinvigorating her expansion approach have been overturned, investors caution, as the energy predicament destabilizes markets and evokes the specter of an economic downturn.
The Chancellor initiated the year with a “steadfastness” declaration, pledging to reduce living expenses as she anticipated declining inflation and interest rates, alongside indications of a surge in corporate confidence to bolster economic growth.
However, the conflict in Iran has fundamentally altered the UK’s financial outlook, economists noted. This development has thwarted Labour’s aspirations of asserting it is stimulating growth leading up to pivotal local elections in May, and has prompted warnings of interest rate hikes from the Bank of England.
Officials at the Treasury speak of a deepening sense of apprehension at One Horse Guards Road as they contemplate what one termed “a profoundly challenging Budget” later in the year.
Reeves, having already increased taxes by £66bn since the previous general election, might be compelled to impose further hikes if she is obligated to implement a costly aid package for households and enterprises grappling with escalating energy expenditures.
“The likelihood of an economic slump has substantially risen at this juncture,” stated Luke Bartholomew, deputy chief economist at the investment firm Aberdeen. Elevated borrowing expenses and ascending energy prices will deliver a “dual impact” to an economy already contending with a weaker employment sector and precarious public finances.
Consumers were already anticipating a financial squeeze in 2026, with salary growth decelerating and a larger portion of their earnings directed towards taxation. Now, numerous households could witness their real wages diminish, as inflation climbs well above 3 percent later in the year, with the costs of essential items like food and fuel once again expected to surge dramatically.
Meanwhile, the proportion of British adults who believe it is difficult to secure employment has reached a post-pandemic peak of 62 percent, according to YouGov survey data released on Friday, with the figure escalating to as high as 79 percent among 18- to 24-year-olds.
“It is challenging to maintain an optimistic perspective on the macroeconomic future right now,” Bartholomew remarked.
UK government bond prices plummeted on Thursday and Friday as investors absorbed the dual prospects of Bank of England rate increases and a further deterioration in the state of public finances.
Reports of prominent Labour figures, including Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, advocating for a relaxation of the fiscal regulations, caused additional unrest in the debt markets, prompting the Treasury to promptly assert that this was not under consideration.
“Rest assured of this government’s unwavering dedication to the fiscal guidelines,” affirmed an ally of Reeves.
Even prior to the energy crisis, there were renewed indicators of a decline in the public finances, with the government borrowing an unexpectedly higher £14.3bn in February.
Reeves declared at Davos earlier this year that the UK was well-positioned to withstand any new financial shocks without requiring further tax increases.
When questioned on Tuesday whether she could reiterate that assertion, Reeves maintained that the UK was in a “significantly stronger position” than when Labour assumed power in July 2024, but she did not directly address the necessity of additional tax hikes.
Some material could not be loaded. Please verify your internet connection or browser configurations.
Outside the Treasury, economists contend that the Chancellor’s ambition of adhering to her fiscal rules has all but vanished as pressure mounts for the government to intervene to support households, businesses, and public services.
Dan Haile, a senior economist at the Institute for Government (IfG), predicted that Reeves would have to “bid farewell” to the £22bn buffer she maintained against her fiscal regulations.
“That sum recedes into the background,” he commented. “Currently, this isn’t an issue concerning fiscal rules; it pertains to fiscal robustness and endurance.”
A repetition of the assistance deployed in 2022—which encompassed reductions in fuel excise duty and considerable subsidies to curb the increase in energy costs for all households—is improbable this time. Reeves has initiated an internal review of the Truss government’s energy package to determine how to more effectively target future aid.
Options presented this week by the Resolution Foundation think-tank explored how an annual “provision” of £3.75bn could be concentrated on lower-income households with the most critical need for heating.
“This is not the opportune moment for the UK public finances to undertake an enormous, boundless gamble on the trajectory of energy markets,” warned Ruth Curtice, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation.
Those with greater incomes might be requested to absorb the impact and exert more effort to reduce energy consumption by driving less frequently, insulating their residences, and installing heat pumps.
However, should the crisis intensify, pleas for the government to intervene on a grander scale will become exceedingly difficult to resist.
Make UK, the manufacturing sector’s advocacy group, characterizes the predicament as “alarming” for many of its constituents, despite most currently being safeguarded by fixed-term energy agreements.
It is urging the government to expedite a program designed to lower energy costs for manufacturers in essential sectors outlined in the UK’s industrial strategy, which was slated for introduction in 2027, at an annual expense ranging between £1bn and £3bn, contingent on eligibility.
“Many segments of our economy are ill-equipped to bear the cost if [energy prices] skyrocket and remain elevated,” remarked Nick Butler, former head of strategy for BP, at an event hosted by the IfG on Friday, highlighting food producers, healthcare facilities, educational institutions, and diesel-dependent railway systems.
“The government must present a comprehensive strategy to ensure uninterrupted supply at a juncture when both price pressures and potential physical scarcities may arise.”